BACKGROUND: Treatment of rectal cancer in North America has been associated with lower rates of sphincter-preserving surgery in comparison with other regions. It is unclear if these lower rates are due to patient, tumor, or treatment factors; thus, the potential to increase the use of sphincter-preserving surgery is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify the factors associated with the use of sphincter-preserving surgery and to quantify the potential for an increase in sphincter preservation. DESIGN: This population-based retrospective cohort study used patient-level data collected through a comprehensive, standardized review of hospital inpatient and outpatient medical records and cancer center charts. SETTINGS: This study was conducted in all hospitals providing rectal cancer surgery in a Canadian province. PATIENTS: All patients with a new diagnosis of rectal cancer from July 1, 2002 to June 30, 2006 who underwent potentially curative radical surgery were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with receiving a permanent colostomy. Patients were categorized as having received an appropriate or potentially inappropriate colostomy based on a priori determined patient, tumor, operative, and pathologic criteria. RESULTS: Of 466 patients who underwent radical surgery, 48% received a permanent colostomy. There was significant variation in the rate of sphincter-preserving surgery among the 10 hospitals that provided rectal cancer care (12%-73%, p = 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, male sex, low tumor height, and increasing tumor stage were associated with the receipt of a permanent colostomy. Among patients who received a permanent stoma, 65 of 224 (29%) patients received a potentially inappropriate stoma. On multivariate analysis, male sex and treatment in a medium- or low-volume hospital was associated with the receipt of a potentially inappropriate colostomy. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the receipt of a permanent colostomy by many patients with rectal cancer may be inappropriate, and there is potential to increase the use of sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with rectal cancer.
BACKGROUND: Treatment of rectal cancer in North America has been associated with lower rates of sphincter-preserving surgery in comparison with other regions. It is unclear if these lower rates are due to patient, tumor, or treatment factors; thus, the potential to increase the use of sphincter-preserving surgery is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify the factors associated with the use of sphincter-preserving surgery and to quantify the potential for an increase in sphincter preservation. DESIGN: This population-based retrospective cohort study used patient-level data collected through a comprehensive, standardized review of hospital inpatient and outpatient medical records and cancer center charts. SETTINGS: This study was conducted in all hospitals providing rectal cancer surgery in a Canadian province. PATIENTS: All patients with a new diagnosis of rectal cancer from July 1, 2002 to June 30, 2006 who underwent potentially curative radical surgery were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with receiving a permanent colostomy. Patients were categorized as having received an appropriate or potentially inappropriate colostomy based on a priori determined patient, tumor, operative, and pathologic criteria. RESULTS: Of 466 patients who underwent radical surgery, 48% received a permanent colostomy. There was significant variation in the rate of sphincter-preserving surgery among the 10 hospitals that provided rectal cancer care (12%-73%, p = 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, male sex, low tumor height, and increasing tumor stage were associated with the receipt of a permanent colostomy. Among patients who received a permanent stoma, 65 of 224 (29%) patients received a potentially inappropriate stoma. On multivariate analysis, male sex and treatment in a medium- or low-volume hospital was associated with the receipt of a potentially inappropriate colostomy. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the receipt of a permanent colostomy by many patients with rectal cancer may be inappropriate, and there is potential to increase the use of sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with rectal cancer.
Authors: Kristen Cagino; Maria S Altieri; Jie Yang; Lizhou Nie; Mark Talamini; Konstantinos Spaniolas; Paula Denoya; Aurora Pryor Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Zaid M Abdelsattar; Sandra L Wong; Nancy J Birkmeyer; Robert K Cleary; Melissa L Times; Ryan E Figg; Nanette Peters; Robert W Krell; Darrell A Campbell; Marcia M Russell; Samantha Hendren Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Sarath Sujatha-Bhaskar; Matthew Whealon; Colette S Inaba; Christina Y Koh; Mehraneh D Jafari; Steven Mills; Alessio Pigazzi; Michael J Stamos; Joseph C Carmichael Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Zbigniew Banaszkiewicz; Łukasz P Woda; Tomasz Zwoliński; Krzysztof Tojek; Paweł Jarmocik; Arkadiusz Jawień Journal: Prz Gastroenterol Date: 2015-02-13
Authors: Robin Urquhart; Cynthia Kendell; Evelyn Cornelissen; Byron J Powell; Laura L Madden; Glenn Kissmann; Sarah A Richmond; Jacqueline L Bender Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 2.692