Literature DB >> 23652478

In vivo screening of extracellular matrix components produced under multiple experimental conditions implanted in one animal.

Gustavo A Higuera1, Jeanine A A Hendriks, Joost van Dalum, Ling Wu, Roka Schotel, Liliana Moreira-Teixeira, Mirella van den Doel, Jeroen C H Leijten, Jens Riesle, Marcel Karperien, Clemens A van Blitterswijk, Lorenzo Moroni.   

Abstract

Animal experiments help to progress and ensure safety of an increasing number of novel therapies, drug development and chemicals. Unfortunately, these also lead to major ethical concerns, costs and limited experimental capacity. We foresee a coercion of all these issues by implantation of well systems directly into vertebrate animals. Here, we used rapid prototyping to create wells with biomaterials to create a three-dimensional (3D) well-system that can be used in vitro and in vivo. First, the well sizes and numbers were adjusted for 3D cell culture and in vitro screening of molecules. Then, the functionality of the wells was evaluated in vivo under 36 conditions for tissue regeneration involving human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) and bovine primary chondrocytes (bPCs) screened in one animal. Each biocompatible well was controlled to contain μl-size volumes of tissue, which led to tissue penetration from the host and tissue formation under implanted conditions. We quantified both physically and biologically the amounts of extracellular matrix (ECM) components found in each well. Using this new concept the co-culture of hMSCs and bPCs was identified as a positive hit for cartilage tissue repair, which was a comparable result using conventional methods. The in vivo screening of candidate conditions opens an entirely new range of experimental possibilities, which significantly abates experimental animal use and increases the pace of discovery of medical treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23652478     DOI: 10.1039/c3ib40023a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)        ISSN: 1757-9694            Impact factor:   2.192


  6 in total

Review 1.  Concise review: unraveling stem cell cocultures in regenerative medicine: which cell interactions steer cartilage regeneration and how?

Authors:  Tommy S de Windt; Jeanine A A Hendriks; Xing Zhao; Lucienne A Vonk; Laura B Creemers; Wouter J A Dhert; Mark A Randolph; Daniel B F Saris
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 2.  Biofabricated constructs as tissue models: a short review.

Authors:  Pedro F Costa
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Glucose gradients influence zonal matrix deposition in 3D cartilage constructs.

Authors:  Tim W G M Spitters; Carlos M D Mota; Samuel C Uzoechi; Barbara Slowinska; Dirk E Martens; Lorenzo Moroni; Marcel Karperien
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  An expandable embryonic stem cell-derived Purkinje neuron progenitor population that exhibits in vivo maturation in the adult mouse cerebellum.

Authors:  Gustavo A Higuera; Grazia Iaffaldano; Meiwand Bedar; Guy Shpak; Robin Broersen; Shashini T Munshi; Catherine Dupont; Joost Gribnau; Femke M S de Vrij; Steven A Kushner; Chris I De Zeeuw
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Translational Application of Microfluidics and Bioprinting for Stem Cell-Based Cartilage Repair.

Authors:  Silvia Lopa; Carlotta Mondadori; Valerio Luca Mainardi; Giuseppe Talò; Marco Costantini; Christian Candrian; Wojciech Święszkowski; Matteo Moretti
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 5.443

6.  Polymer-mineral scaffold augments in vivo equine multipotent stromal cell osteogenesis.

Authors:  Wei Duan; Cong Chen; Masudul Haque; Daniel Hayes; Mandi J Lopez
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 6.832

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.