Literature DB >> 23652416

Vertebral augmentation with nitinol endoprosthesis: clinical experience in 40 patients with 1-year follow-up.

Giovanni Carlo Anselmetti1, Antonio Manca, Stefano Marcia, Gabriele Chiara, Stefano Marini, Gamal Baroud, Daniele Regge, Filippo Montemurro.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the clinical outcomes of patients treated by vertebral augmentation with nitinol endoprosthesis (VNE) to treat painful vertebral compression fractures.
METHODS: Forty patients with one or more painful osteoporotic VCF, confirmed by MRI and accompanied by back-pain unresponsive to a minimum 2 months of conservative medical treatment, underwent VNE at 42 levels. Preoperative and postoperative pain measured with Visual Analog Scale (VAS), disability measured by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and vertebral height restoration (measured with 2-dimensional reconstruction CT) were compared at last follow-up (average follow-up 15 months). Cement extravasation, subsequent fractures, and implant migration were recorded.
RESULTS: Long-term follow-up was obtained in 38 of 40 patients. Both VAS and ODI significantly improved from a median of 8.0 (range 5-10) and 66 % (range 44-88 %) to 0.5 (range 0-8) and 6 % (range 6-66 %), respectively, at 1 year (p < 0.0001). Vertebral height measurements comparing time points increased in a statistically significant manner (ANOVA, p < 0.001). Overall cement extravasation rate was 9.5 %. Discal and venous leakage rates were 7.1 and 0 % respectively. No symptomatic extravasations occurred. Five of 38 (13.1 %) patients experienced new spontaneous, osteoporotic fractures. No device change or migration was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: VNE is a safe and effective procedure that is able to provide long-lasting pain relief and durable vertebral height gain with a low rate of new fractures and cement leakages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23652416     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-013-0623-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of pain reduction and height restoration post vertebral augmentation using a polyether ether ketone (PEEK) polymer implant for the treatment of split (Magerl A2) vertebral fractures: a prospective, long-term, non-randomized study.

Authors:  Georgios Velonakis; Dimitrios Filippiadis; Stavros Spiliopoulos; Elias Brountzos; Nikolaos Kelekis; Alexis Kelekis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Percutaneous stabilization of lumbar spine: a literature review and new options in treating spine pain.

Authors:  Stefano Marcia; Luca Saba; Mariangela Marras; Jasjit S Suri; Eros Calabria; Salvatore Masala
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Beyond the pedicle screw-a patent review.

Authors:  Esther P de Kater; Aimée Sakes; Erik Edström; Adrian Elmi-Terander; Gerald Kraan; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.721

4.  Vertebral Stenting and Vertebroplasty Guided by an Angiographic 3D Rotational Unit.

Authors:  Escobar-de la Garma Víctor Hugo; Jorge-Barroso Henry Luis; Padilla-Vázquez Felipe; Balderrama-Bañares Jorge Luis
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2015-02-23

Review 5.  Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty--a review.

Authors:  Yang Yimin; Ren Zhiwei; Ma Wei; Rajiv Jha
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2013-10-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.