Literature DB >> 23651911

Development of a patient-centered aggregate score to predict survival after lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer.

Alessandro Brunelli1, Michele Salati, Majed Refai, Francesco Xiumé, Rossana Berardi, Paola Mazzanti, Cecilia Pompili.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to develop a survival aggregate score (SAS), including objective and subjective patient-based parameters, and assess its prognostic role after major anatomic resection for non-small cell lung cancer.
METHODS: A total of 245 patients underwent major lung resections for non-small cell lung cancer with preoperative evaluation of quality of life (Short-Form 36v2 survey) and complete follow-up. The Cox multivariable regression and bootstrap analyses were used to identify prognostic factors of overall servival, which were weighted to construct the scoring system and summed to generate the SAS.
RESULTS: Cox regression analysis showed that the factors negatively associated with overall survival and used to construct the score were 36-item short-form health survey physical component summary score less than 50 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.7; P = .008), aged older than 70 years (HR, 1.9; P = .002), and carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity less than 70% (HR, 1.7; P = .01). Patients were grouped into 4 risk classes according to their SAS. The 5-year overall survival was 78% in class SAS0, 59% in class SAS1, 42% in class SAS2, and 14% in class SAS3 (log-rank test, P < .0001). SAS maintained its association with overall survival in patients with stages pT1 (log-rank test, P = .01), pT2 (log-rank test, P = .02), or pT3-4 (log-rank test, P = .001), and in those with stages pN0 (log-rank test, P = .0005) or pN1-2 (log-rank test, P = .02). The 5-year cancer-specific survival was 83% in class SAS0, 71% in class SAS1, 63% in class SAS2, and 17% in class SAS3 (log-rank test, P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This system may be used to refine stratification of prognosis for clinical and research purposes.
Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  10.4; 36-item short-form health survey; CI; DLCO; ECOG; Eastern Cooperative Oncology group; FEV(1); FVC; HR; LTFU; MCS; NSCLC; PCS; QoL; SAS; SF36; SF36v2; Short-Form 36v2; carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity; confidence interval; forced expiratory volume in 1 second; forced vital capacity; hazard ratio; lost to follow-up; mental component summary; non–small cell lung cancer; physical component summary; quality of life; survival aggregate score

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23651911     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  7 in total

1.  Quality assessment using EQ-5D-5L after lung surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Authors:  Ryo Koide; Ami Kikuchi; Masahiro Miyajima; Taijiro Mishina; Yuki Takahashi; Miho Okawa; Izumi Sawada; Junko Nakajima; Atsushi Watanabe; Toru Mizuguchi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-05-16

2.  Survival and Racial Differences of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States Military.

Authors:  Christina Brzezniak; Sacha Satram-Hoang; Hans-Peter Goertz; Carolina Reyes; Ashok Gunuganti; Christopher Gallagher; Corey A Carter
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Analysis of longitudinal quality-of-life data in high-risk operable patients with lung cancer: results from the ACOSOG Z4032 (Alliance) multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Hiran C Fernando; Rodney J Landreneau; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Francis C Nichols; Thomas A DiPetrillo; Bryan F Meyers; Dwight E Heron; Shauna L Hillman; David R Jones; Sandra L Starnes; Angelina D Tan; Benedict D T Daly; Joe B Putnam
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in adults with non-small cell Lung Cancer: a scoping review.

Authors:  Kuan Liao; Tianxiao Wang; Jake Coomber-Moore; David C Wong; Fabio Gomes; Corinne Faivre-Finn; Matthew Sperrin; Janelle Yorke; Sabine N van der Veer
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer: contemporary outcomes, risk factors and model validation.

Authors:  Annemarie Brunswicker; Marcus Taylor; Stuart W Grant; Udo Abah; Matthew Smith; Michael Shackcloth; Felice Granato; Rajesh Shah; Kandadai Rammohan
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-06-01

Review 6.  High-intensity interval training in the prehabilitation of cancer patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefano Palma; Timothy Hasenoehrl; Galateja Jordakieva; Dariga Ramazanova; Richard Crevenna
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Survival Prediction Model Using Clinico-Pathologic Characteristics for Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Patients After Curative Resection.

Authors:  Ching-Yang Wu; Jui-Ying Fu; Ching-Feng Wu; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Yun-Hen Liu; Yi-Cheng Wu; Cheng-Ta Yang; Ying-Huang Tsai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.