Literature DB >> 2365134

Behavioral reactions to gustatory stimuli in young chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus).

J R Ganchrow1, J E Steiner, A Bartana.   

Abstract

Freely-moving, posthatch chicks were individually presented 2 concentrations each of quinine, citric acid, fructose, sucrose, sodium saccharin, and distilled water and their behavioral reactions were videotaped and analyzed. Already during the first posthatch day distinct rejection responses to quinine and citric acid could be recognized. Prolonged head shaking and beak clapping episodes were the most dominant features of these reactions. While responses to water and sweet stimuli could be interpreted as acceptance behaviors, the resolution was generally not fine enough to discriminate between reactions to the 2 different sweet concentrations of these stimuli or between them and water. When only water or sugar solutions were presented to other hatchlings in a single session, there was a suggestion of more definite acceptance behavior to some sweet stimuli as compared to water. It is concluded that the systems mediating aversive gustatory responses are present and functioning in posthatching chicks while acceptance responses, though present, are less discriminative among stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2365134     DOI: 10.1002/dev.420230202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychobiol        ISSN: 0012-1630            Impact factor:   3.038


  16 in total

1.  Major taste loss in carnivorous mammals.

Authors:  Peihua Jiang; Jesusa Josue; Xia Li; Dieter Glaser; Weihua Li; Joseph G Brand; Robert F Margolskee; Danielle R Reed; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Genetics of taste receptors.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Cailu Lin; Ichiro Matsumoto; Makoto Ohmoto; Danielle R Reed; Theodore M Nelson
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

3.  Distribution of α-Gustducin and Vimentin in premature and mature taste buds in chickens.

Authors:  Nandakumar Venkatesan; Prasangi Rajapaksha; Jason Payne; Forrest Goodfellow; Zhonghou Wang; Fuminori Kawabata; Shoji Tabata; Steven Stice; Robert Beckstead; Hong-Xiang Liu
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 4.  The gustatory and olfactory systems during infancy: implications for development of feeding behaviors in the high-risk neonate.

Authors:  Sarah V Lipchock; Danielle R Reed; Julie A Mennella
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.430

5.  Genetics of sweet taste preferences.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Wely B Floriano; Masashi Inoue; Xia Li; Cailu Lin; Vladimir O Murovets; Danielle R Reed; Vasily A Zolotarev; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Flavour Fragr J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.576

6.  Evolution of the sweet taste receptor gene Tas1r2 in bats.

Authors:  Huabin Zhao; Yingying Zhou; C Miguel Pinto; Pierre Charles-Dominique; Jorge Galindo-González; Shuyi Zhang; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  The Relationship between Infant Facial Expressions and Food Acceptance.

Authors:  Catherine A Forestell; Julie A Mennella
Journal:  Curr Nutr Rep       Date:  2017-04-29

8.  Abundant proliferating cells within early chicken taste buds indicate a potentially "built-in" progenitor system for taste bud growth during maturation in hatchlings.

Authors:  Zhonghou Wang; Yuta Yoshida; Naomi E Kramer; Fuminori Kawabata; Shoji Tabata; Woo K Kim; Hong-Xiang Liu
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  RNA-Seq analysis on chicken taste sensory organs: An ideal system to study organogenesis.

Authors:  Xiaogang Cui; Brett Marshall; Ning Shi; Shi-You Chen; Romdhane Rekaya; Hong-Xiang Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Birds Generally Carry a Small Repertoire of Bitter Taste Receptor Genes.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Huabin Zhao
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.