Literature DB >> 23650286

Comparison of cell-loading methods in hydrogel systems.

Jinling Ma1, Fang Yang, Sanne K Both, Monique Kersten-Niessen, Matilde Bongio, Juli Pan, Fu-Zhai Cui, F Kurtis Kasper, Antonios G Mikos, John A Jansen, Jeroen J J P van den Beucken.   

Abstract

Bone regenerative medicine, based on the combined use of cells and scaffolds, represents a promising strategy in bone regeneration. Hydrogels have attracted huge interests for application as a scaffold for minimally invasive surgery. Collagen and oligo(poly(ethylene glycol)fumarate) (OPF) hydrogels are the representatives of two main categories of hydrogels, that is, natural- and synthetic-based hydrogels. With these the optimal cell-loading (i.e., cell distribution inside the hydrogels) method was assessed. The cell behavior of both bone marrow- and adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM- and AT-MSCs) in three loading methods, which are dispersed (i.e., homogeneous cell encapsulation, D), sandwich (i.e., cells located in between two hydrogel layers, S), and spheroid (i.e., cell pellets encapsulation, Sp) loading in two hydrogel systems (i.e., collagen and OPF), was compared. The results suggested that the cell behavior was influenced by the hydrogel type, meaning cells cultured in collagen hydrogels had higher proliferation and osteogenic differentiation capacity than in OPF hydrogels. In addition, AT-MSCs exhibited higher proliferation and osteogenic properties compared to BM-MSCs. However, no difference was observed for mineralization among the three loading methods, which did not approve the hypothesis that S and Sp loading would increase osteogenic capacity compared to D loading. In conclusion, D and Sp loading represents two promising cell loading methods for injectable bone substitute materials that allow application of minimally invasive surgery for cell-based regenerative treatment.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone regenerative medicine; cell-loading; hydrogels; mesenchymal stem cells; spheroids

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23650286     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  3 in total

1.  Effects of nanofiber scaffolds coated with nanoparticulate and micro-particulate FDBA on the morphology, adhesion and proliferation of human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Shabnam Aghayan; Ehsan Seyedjafari; Shadi Hamidi
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2022-05-01

2.  Effect of Nano-HA/Collagen Composite Hydrogels on Osteogenic Behavior of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.

Authors:  Astghik Hayrapetyan; Matilde Bongio; Sander C G Leeuwenburgh; John A Jansen; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 3.  Cardiac Stem Cell-Loaded Delivery Systems: A New Challenge for Myocardial Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Antonia Mancuso; Antonella Barone; Maria Chiara Cristiano; Eleonora Cianflone; Massimo Fresta; Donatella Paolino
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.