Literature DB >> 23650283

GDNF-RET signaling in ER-positive breast cancers is a key determinant of response and resistance to aromatase inhibitors.

Andrea Morandi1, Lesley-Ann Martin, Qiong Gao, Sunil Pancholi, Alan Mackay, David Robertson, Marketa Zvelebil, Mitch Dowsett, Ivan Plaza-Menacho, Clare M Isacke.   

Abstract

Most breast cancers at diagnosis are estrogen receptor-positive (ER(+)) and depend on estrogen for growth and survival. Blocking estrogen biosynthesis by aromatase inhibitors has therefore become a first-line endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with ER(+) breast cancers. Despite providing substantial improvements in patient outcome, aromatase inhibitor resistance remains a major clinical challenge. The receptor tyrosine kinase, RET, and its coreceptor, GFRα1, are upregulated in a subset of ER(+) breast cancers, and the RET ligand, glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is upregulated by inflammatory cytokines. Here, we report the findings of a multidisciplinary strategy to address the impact of GDNF-RET signaling in the response to aromatase inhibitor treatment. In breast cancer cells in two-dimensional and three-dimensional culture, GDNF-mediated RET signaling is enhanced in a model of aromatase inhibitor resistance. Furthermore, GDNF-RET signaling promoted the survival of aromatase inhibitor-resistant cells and elicited resistance in aromatase inhibitor-sensitive cells. Both these effects were selectively reverted by the RET kinase inhibitor, NVP-BBT594. Gene expression profiling in ER(+) cancers defined a proliferation-independent GDNF response signature that prognosed poor patient outcome and, more importantly, predicted poor response to aromatase inhibitor treatment with the development of resistance. We validated these findings by showing increased RET protein expression levels in an independent cohort of aromatase inhibitor-resistant patient specimens. Together, our results establish GDNF-RET signaling as a rational therapeutic target to combat or delay the onset of aromatase inhibitor resistance in breast cancer. ©2013 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23650283      PMCID: PMC3686594          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  49 in total

Review 1.  Targeting insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Francesco Atzori; Tiffany A Traina; Maria Teresa Ionta; Bruno Massidda
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 4.493

2.  Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes predict clinical outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sahar M A Mahmoud; Emma Claire Paish; Desmond G Powe; R Douglas Macmillan; Matthew J Grainge; Andrew H S Lee; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Insulin-like growth factor receptor levels are regulated by cell density and by long term estrogen deprivation in MCF7 human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  R L Stephen; L E Shaw; C Larsen; D Corcoran; P D Darbre
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-07-16       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  HER-2 amplification, HER-1 expression, and tamoxifen response in estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a southwest oncology group study.

Authors:  Grazia Arpino; Stephanie J Green; D Craig Allred; Dannika Lew; Silvana Martino; C Kent Osborne; Richard M Elledge
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Biological processes associated with breast cancer clinical outcome depend on the molecular subtypes.

Authors:  Christine Desmedt; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Pratyaksha Wirapati; Marc Buyse; Denis Larsimont; Gianluca Bontempi; Mauro Delorenzi; Martine Piccart; Christos Sotiriou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: status report 2004.

Authors:  Eric P Winer; Clifford Hudis; Harold J Burstein; Antonio C Wolff; Kathleen I Pritchard; James N Ingle; Rowan T Chlebowski; Richard Gelber; Stephan B Edge; Julie Gralow; Melody A Cobleigh; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Lori J Goldstein; Timothy J Whelan; Trevor J Powles; John Bryant; Cheryl Perkins; Judy Perotti; Susan Braun; Amy S Langer; George P Browman; Mark R Somerfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  RET in breast cancer: functional and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Andrea Morandi; Ivan Plaza-Menacho; Clare M Isacke
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 11.951

8.  Close and stable relationship between proliferation and a hypoxia metagene in aromatase inhibitor-treated ER-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Zara Ghazoui; Francesca M Buffa; Anita K Dunbier; Helen Anderson; Tim Dexter; Simone Detre; Janine Salter; Ian E Smith; Adrian L Harris; Mitchell Dowsett
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Life following aromatase inhibitors--where now for endocrine sequencing?

Authors:  Stephen R Johnston; Lesley-Ann Martin; Mitch Dowsett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  An immune response gene expression module identifies a good prognosis subtype in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrew E Teschendorff; Ahmad Miremadi; Sarah E Pinder; Ian O Ellis; Carlos Caldas
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  43 in total

Review 1.  Metabolic implication of tumor:stroma crosstalk in breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrea Morandi; Paola Chiarugi
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Quantitative analysis of receptor tyrosine kinase-effector coupling at functionally relevant stimulus levels.

Authors:  Simin Li; Devayani Bhave; Jennifer M Chow; Thomas V Riera; Sandra Schlee; Simone Rauch; Mariya Atanasova; Richard L Cate; Adrian Whitty
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  RET revisited: expanding the oncogenic portfolio.

Authors:  Lois M Mulligan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 4.  The molecular basis for RET tyrosine-kinase inhibitors in thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Valentina De Falco; Francesca Carlomagno; Hong-Yu Li; Massimo Santoro
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.690

5.  Efficacy of Cabozantinib and Nivolumab in Treating Hepatocellular Carcinoma with RET Amplification, High Tumor Mutational Burden, and PD-L1 Expression.

Authors:  Xiaobo Yang; Junping Shi; Xiaoqian Chen; Yan Jiang; Haitao Zhao
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-02-26

Review 6.  Targeting RET-driven cancers: lessons from evolving preclinical and clinical landscapes.

Authors:  Alexander Drilon; Zishuo I Hu; Gillianne G Y Lai; Daniel S W Tan
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Citrullination/Methylation Crosstalk on Histone H3 Regulates ER-Target Gene Transcription.

Authors:  Kathleen W Clancy; Anna-Maria Russell; Venkataraman Subramanian; Hannah Nguyen; Yuewei Qian; Robert M Campbell; Paul R Thompson
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 8.  Thyroid C-Cell Biology and Oncogenic Transformation.

Authors:  Gilbert J Cote; Elizabeth G Grubbs; Marie-Claude Hofmann
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2015

Review 9.  Neurotrophic Factors and Their Potential Applications in Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Nan Xiao; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz)       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.291

10.  Chronic expression of wild-type Ret receptor in the mammary gland induces luminal tumors that are sensitive to Ret inhibition.

Authors:  Albana Gattelli; Martín E García Solá; Tim C Roloff; Robert D Cardiff; Edith C Kordon; Lewis A Chodosh; Nancy E Hynes
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.