Literature DB >> 23649902

Patient and carer views on participating in clinical trials for prodromal Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.

Vanessa Lawrence1, James Pickett, Clive Ballard, Joanna Murray.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is great interest in conducting clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies in the prodromal (early, pre-dementia), asymptomatic stages of Alzheimer's disease. Diagnostic biomarker tests offer a means of identifying prodromal patients, but it is unclear how potential participants feel about their use. Deciding whether to take part in a clinical trial is a complex process in which eligible participants must balance risks and discomforts against uncertain benefits. We sought to explore the views of potential participants through qualitative research methods.
METHODS: Focus groups with people with early memory problems, current and former family carers explored attitudes towards participating in clinical trials in the prodromal stages of the disease, using an example of anti-amyloid antibody-therapy (immunotherapy), which are currently in development.
RESULTS: Despite the complexities involved, almost all participants had a clear idea about whether they, personally, would like to take part. Many were highly motivated to obtain an unambiguous diagnosis, regardless of their desire to participate in a clinical trial. Participants expressed minimal concern regarding the risk of adverse events associated with immunotherapy, whereas certain tests and trial procedures provoked greater anxiety. People with memory problems were found to assess the study demands in relation to their own priorities and circumstances.
CONCLUSIONS: The priorities of patients might be different to clinicians and those who design and regulate clinical trials. Patient views can be used to inform the ethical debate around the disclosure of biomarker status, the design of clinical trials and the content of trial information.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer's Disease; Mild Cognitive Impairment; engagement in research trials; immunotherapy; patients; qualitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23649902     DOI: 10.1002/gps.3958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry        ISSN: 0885-6230            Impact factor:   3.485


  15 in total

1.  Patient and Caregiver Assessment of the Benefits From the Clinical Use of Amyloid PET Imaging.

Authors:  Rafid Mustafa; Jared R Brosch; Gil D Rabinovici; Bradford C Dickerson; Maria C Carrillo; Bradley S Glazier; Sujuan Gao; Martha Tierney; Keith N Fargo; Mary G Austrom; Susan De Santi; David G Clark; Liana G Apostolova
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.703

2.  Study partners perform essential tasks in dementia research and can experience burdens and benefits in this role.

Authors:  Betty S Black; Holly A Taylor; Peter V Rabins; Jason Karlawish
Journal:  Dementia (London)       Date:  2016-05-13

3.  A Preliminary Study of Clinical Trial Enrollment Decisions Among People With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Their Study Partners.

Authors:  Chelsea G Cox; Mary M Ryan B A; Daniel L Gillen; Joshua D Grill
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.105

4.  Patient and caregiver reactions to clinical amyloid imaging.

Authors:  Joshua D Grill; Chelsea G Cox; Sarah Kremen; Mario F Mendez; Edmond Teng; Jill Shapira; John M Ringman; Liana G Apostolova
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 21.566

5.  A Survey of Knowledge and Views Concerning Genetic and Amyloid PET Status Disclosure.

Authors:  B R Ott; M A Pelosi; G Tremont; P J Snyder
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2016-01-01

Review 6.  Timely Diagnosis for Alzheimer's Disease: A Literature Review on Benefits and Challenges.

Authors:  Bruno Dubois; Alessandro Padovani; Philip Scheltens; Andrea Rossi; Grazia Dell'Agnello
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 7.  Communicating mild cognitive impairment diagnoses with and without amyloid imaging.

Authors:  Joshua D Grill; Liana G Apostolova; Szofia Bullain; Jeffrey M Burns; Chelsea G Cox; Malcolm Dick; Dean Hartley; Claudia Kawas; Sarah Kremen; Jennifer Lingler; Oscar L Lopez; Mark Mapstone; Aimee Pierce; Gil Rabinovici; J Scott Roberts; Seyed Ahmad Sajjadi; Edmond Teng; Jason Karlawish
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 6.982

Review 8.  From information to follow-up: Ethical recommendations to facilitate the disclosure of amyloid PET scan results in a research setting.

Authors:  Gwendolien Vanderschaeghe; Jolien Schaeverbeke; Rose Bruffaerts; Rik Vandenberghe; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2018-05-24

9.  Attitudes toward clinical trials across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum.

Authors:  Michelle M Nuño; Daniel L Gillen; Kulwant K Dosanjh; Jenny Brook; David Elashoff; John M Ringman; Joshua D Grill
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 6.982

10.  Amnestic MCI patients' experiences after disclosure of their amyloid PET result in a research context.

Authors:  Gwendolien Vanderschaeghe; Jolien Schaeverbeke; Rose Bruffaerts; Rik Vandenberghe; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 6.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.