Literature DB >> 23649204

Inappropriate and cloned clinical histories on radiology request forms for sick children.

Chetan Chandulal Shah1, Leann Linam, S Bruce Greenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An appropriate clinical history improves the perception and interpretation of radiographic examinations in children and adults. However, clinical history provided on radiology request has not been studied for its appropriateness and frequency of cloned clinical history.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of inappropriate histories and cloned histories at a tertiary-care children's hospital.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed radiology request forms of 388 outpatient and inpatient radiographic examinations obtained on 3 days during the same month at a tertiary-care children's hospital. Appropriateness of the clinical history was judged by its relevance to the examination ordered and appropriate associated billable ICD-9 code. Cloning was defined as identical clinical histories appearing on the radiology request on three consecutive days. Cloned histories were further subdivided as being appropriate or inappropriate.
RESULTS: A total of 18% (70/388) of the requests for clinical history were either inappropriate, cloned or both. Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) referrals constituted the majority (82%, 9/11) of combined inappropriate history and cloning. NICU referrals accounted for 52% (28/54) of all inappropriate clinical histories, a significantly higher percentage than other inpatient locations (P = 0.006). The cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) was the second most common patient location for inappropriate clinical histories (11%, 6/54). About one-third of the radiographic requests from the NICU had inappropriate histories (35%, 28/79). Among the outpatient referrals, 50% (4/8) of the inappropriate histories were from the emergency department. The most common cloned histories included "hypoplastic left heart syndrome" (15%, 4/27), "endotracheal tube placement" (11%, 3/27) and "evaluate lung fields and bowel" (11%, 3/27). The most commonly cloned clinical history was seen on referrals from the NICU at 63% (17/27), a significantly higher percentage than other inpatient locations (P = 0.006). The CVICU unit accounted for the second most common patient location for cloned clinical histories (26%, 7/27). The cloned clinical history on the referral request for radiography was unjustified in 48% (13/27) of the cases. NICU referrals had 85% (11/13) of the unjustified cloned histories.
CONCLUSION: Inpatient units, particularly the NICU, were most likely to have inappropriate histories and cloning. Cloning was clinically justified in about half of the cases of cloning. The patterns of inappropriate histories and cloning suggest possible corrective measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23649204     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-013-2648-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  8 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review.

Authors:  Clement T Loy; Les Irwig
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Comparison of two methods to transmit clinical history information from referring providers to radiologists.

Authors:  Rajan Agarwal; Michael H Bleshman; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Influence of clinical history on perception of abnormalities in pediatric radiographs.

Authors:  K S Berbaum; E A Franken; D D Dorfman; K R Lueben
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Routine chest radiographs in pediatric intensive care units.

Authors:  M W Quasney; D M Goodman; M Billow; H Chiu; L Easterling; L Frankel; D Habib; M Heitschmidt; S Kurachek; F Moler; V Montgomery; M Moss; S Murman; T Rice; B Richman; S Tilden
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Analysis of radiological examination request forms in conjunction with justification of X-ray exposures.

Authors:  Ch Triantopoulou; I Tsalafoutas; P Maniatis; D Papavdis; G Raios; I Siafas; S Velonakis; E Koulentianos
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Financial impact of elimination of routine chest radiographs in a pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  M B Price; M J Grant; K Welkie
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Abandoning daily routine chest radiography in the intensive care unit: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuji Oba; Tareq Zaza
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The European Directive on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionising radiation in relation to medical exposures (97/43/EURATOM).

Authors:  D Teunen
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.394

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Follow-up regarding inappropriate and cloned clinical histories on radiology request forms for sick children.

Authors:  S Bruce Greenberg; Leann Linam; Chetan Chandulal Shah
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-08-10

2.  Safe Practices for Copy and Paste in the EHR. Systematic Review, Recommendations, and Novel Model for Health IT Collaboration.

Authors:  Amy Y Tsou; Christoph U Lehmann; Jeremy Michel; Ronni Solomon; Lorraine Possanza; Tejal Gandhi
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Auditing The Completeness and Legibility of Computerized Radiological Request Forms.

Authors:  Yahya Al Muallem; Majed Al Dogether; Mowafa Househ; Basema Saddik
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 4.460

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.