Literature DB >> 23649165

Microfluidic platforms for mechanobiology.

William J Polacheck1, Ran Li, Sebastien G M Uzel, Roger D Kamm.   

Abstract

Mechanotransduction has been a topic of considerable interest since early studies demonstrated a link between mechanical force and biological response. Until recently, studies of fundamental phenomena were based either on in vivo experiments with limited control or direct access, or on large-scale in vitro studies lacking many of the potentially important physiological factors. With the advent of microfluidics, many of the previous limitations of in vitro testing were eliminated or reduced through greater control or combined functionalities. At the same time, imaging capabilities were tremendously enhanced. In this review, we discuss how microfluidics has transformed the study of mechanotransduction. This is done in the context of the various cell types that exhibit force-induced responses and the new biological insights that have been elucidated. We also discuss new microfluidic studies that could produce even more realistic models of in vivo conditions by combining multiple stimuli or creating a more realistic microenvironment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23649165      PMCID: PMC3714214          DOI: 10.1039/c3lc41393d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  122 in total

Review 1.  Flexible substrata for the detection of cellular traction forces.

Authors:  Karen A Beningo; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 20.808

2.  Biomimetic technique for adhesion-based collection and separation of cells in a microfluidic channel.

Authors:  Wesley C Chang; Luke P Lee; Dorian Liepmann
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  A microfluidic culture platform for CNS axonal injury, regeneration and transport.

Authors:  Anne M Taylor; Mathew Blurton-Jones; Seog Woo Rhee; David H Cribbs; Carl W Cotman; Noo Li Jeon
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 4.  Interstitial flow and its effects in soft tissues.

Authors:  Melody A Swartz; Mark E Fleury
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.590

5.  Effect of mechanical loading on three-dimensional cultures of embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Valerie F Shimko; William C Claycomb
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  The dynamic response of vascular endothelial cells to fluid shear stress.

Authors:  C F Dewey; S R Bussolari; M A Gimbrone; P F Davies
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Matrix stiffness-induced myofibroblast differentiation is mediated by intrinsic mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Xiangwei Huang; Naiheng Yang; Vincent F Fiore; Thomas H Barker; Yi Sun; Stephan W Morris; Qiang Ding; Victor J Thannickal; Yong Zhou
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 6.914

8.  Shear stress-mediated NO production in inner medullary collecting duct cells.

Authors:  Z Cai; J Xin; D M Pollock; J S Pollock
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2000-08

Review 9.  The organizing principle: microenvironmental influences in the normal and malignant breast.

Authors:  Mina J Bissell; Derek C Radisky; Aylin Rizki; Valerie M Weaver; Ole W Petersen
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.880

10.  Spatially resolved shear distribution in microfluidic chip for studying force transduction mechanisms in cells.

Authors:  Jianbin Wang; Jinseok Heo; Susan Z Hua
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 6.799

View more
  67 in total

1.  Probing Cell Deformability via Acoustically Actuated Bubbles.

Authors:  Yuliang Xie; Nitesh Nama; Peng Li; Zhangming Mao; Po-Hsun Huang; Chenglong Zhao; Francesco Costanzo; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Small       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 13.281

Review 2.  Strategies for improving the physiological relevance of human engineered tissues.

Authors:  Rosalyn D Abbott; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 19.536

3.  Microfluidics 3D gel-island chip for single cell isolation and lineage-dependent drug responses study.

Authors:  Zhixiong Zhang; Yu-Chih Chen; Yu-Heng Cheng; Yi Luan; Euisik Yoon
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Organoids-on-a-chip.

Authors:  Sunghee Estelle Park; Andrei Georgescu; Dongeun Huh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Adaptive responses of murine osteoblasts subjected to coupled mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  Jean C Serrano; Jose Cora-Cruz; Nanette Diffoot-Carlo; Paul A Sundaram
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-09-14

6.  Inducing chemotactic and haptotactic cues in microfluidic devices for three-dimensional in vitro assays.

Authors:  O Moreno-Arotzena; G Mendoza; M Cóndor; T Rüberg; J M García-Aznar
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Microfabricated Devices for Confocal Microscopy on Biological Samples.

Authors:  Nicole Y Morgan
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

8.  Microfluidic modeling of the biophysical microenvironment in tumor cell invasion.

Authors:  Yu Ling Huang; Jeffrey E Segall; Mingming Wu
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 9.  Influence of the microenvironment on cell fate determination and migration.

Authors:  Alexander B Bloom; Muhammad H Zaman
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.107

10.  Simultaneous or Sequential Orthogonal Gradient Formation in a 3D Cell Culture Microfluidic Platform.

Authors:  Sebastien G M Uzel; Ovid C Amadi; Taylor M Pearl; Richard T Lee; Peter T C So; Roger D Kamm
Journal:  Small       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 13.281

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.