Literature DB >> 23648913

Hemodynamic monitoring.

Steven M Hollenberg1.   

Abstract

Hemodynamic assessment is a key component of the evaluation of the critically ill patients and has both diagnostic and prognostic utility. This review outlines a general approach to assessment of hemodynamics and perfusion, and then discusses various hemodynamic parameters: heart rate, BP, intravascular (central venous and pulmonary artery) pressures, cardiac output, and myocardial performance, within the context not only of how they are best measured but also how they should be used in a clinical context. Hemodynamics are best assessed using a combination of not only different hemodynamic parameters but also those with the inclusion of clinical indices of perfusion. The benefits of these techniques, as with all medical testing and interventions, must be weighed against any potential risks. Although what to measure and how to measure it is important, what is most important is how to use the information. Evaluating the response to therapeutic interventions is frequently the most useful way to employ hemodynamic monitoring techniques. For the practitioner, learning how to select from a robust set of hemodynamic tools and how to tailor their use to individual clinical settings will allow for optimal patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23648913     DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-1901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  6 in total

1.  Intraoperative monitoring of stroke volume variation versus central venous pressure in laparoscopic liver surgery: a randomized prospective comparative trial.

Authors:  Francesca Ratti; Federica Cipriani; Raffaella Reineke; Marco Catena; Michele Paganelli; Laura Comotti; Luigi Beretta; Luca Aldrighetti
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitor Designed for Patients With Heart Failure Supported with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Pavol Sajgalik; Vaclav Kremen; Vratislav Fabian; Simon Maltais; John M Stulak; Sudhir S Kushwaha; Lyle D Joyce; John A Schirger; Bruce D Johnson
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.872

3.  Effectiveness of treatment based on PiCCO parameters in critically ill patients with septic shock and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Hongying Ni; Zhixian Qian
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Evolved role of the cardiovascular intensive care unit (CICU).

Authors:  Shunji Kasaoka
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2017-12-22

Review 5.  Haemodynamic monitoring in acute heart failure - what you need to know.

Authors:  Karolina Jasińska-Gniadzik; Piotr Szwed; Aleksandra Gasecka; Mateusz Zawadka; Marcin Grabowski; Arkadiusz Pietrasik
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 1.065

6.  Conventional hemodynamic resuscitation may fail to optimize tissue perfusion: an observational study on the effects of dobutamine, enoximone, and norepinephrine in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Corstiaan A den Uil; Wim K Lagrand; Martin van der Ent; Koen Nieman; Ard Struijs; Lucia S D Jewbali; Alina A Constantinescu; Peter E Spronk; Maarten L Simoons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.