| Literature DB >> 23648336 |
Ann Skingley1, Hilary Bungay2, Stephen Clift3, June Warden4.
Abstract
Existing randomized controlled trials within the health field suggest that the concept of randomization is not always well understood and that feelings of disappointment may occur when participants are not placed in their preferred arm. This may affect a study's rigour and ethical integrity if not addressed. We aimed to test whether these issues apply to a healthy volunteer sample within a health promotion trial of singing for older people. Written comments from control group participants at two points during the trial were analysed, together with individual semi-structured interviews with a small sample (n = 11) of this group. We found that motivation to participate in the trial was largely due to the appeal of singing and disappointment resulted from allocation to the control group. Understanding of randomization was generally good and feelings of disappointment lessened over time and with a post-research opportunity to sing. Findings suggest that measures should be put in place to minimize the potential negative impacts of randomized controlled trials in health promotion research.Entities:
Keywords: arts and health; control group; older people; randomized controlled trial
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23648336 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dat026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Promot Int ISSN: 0957-4824 Impact factor: 2.483