Literature DB >> 23648182

The use of virtual screening and differential scanning fluorimetry for the rapid identification of fragments active against MEK1.

Kwame Amaning1, Maryse Lowinski, Francois Vallee, Valerie Steier, Christophe Marcireau, Antonio Ugolini, Cecile Delorme, Frédéric Foucalt, Gary McCort, Nathalie Derimay, Cyrielle Andouche, Stephanie Vougier, Sylvie Llopart, Nis Halland, Alexey Rak.   

Abstract

We report the analysis of an in-house fragment screening campaign for the oncology target MEK1. The application of virtual screening (VS) as a primary fragment screening approach, followed by biophysical validation using differential screening fluorimetry (DSF), with resultant binding mode determination by X-ray crystallography (X-ray), is presented as the most time and cost-effective combination of in silico and in vitro methods to identify fragments. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the VS-DSF workflow for the early identification of fragments to both 'jump-start' the drug discovery project and to complement biochemical screening data.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23648182     DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett        ISSN: 0960-894X            Impact factor:   2.823


  11 in total

1.  Fragment-Based Discovery of Novel Allosteric MEK1 Binders.

Authors:  Paolo Di Fruscia; Fredrik Edfeldt; Igor Shamovsky; Gavin W Collie; Anna Aagaard; Louise Barlind; Ulf Börjesson; Eva L Hansson; Richard J Lewis; Magnus K Nilsson; Linda Öster; Josefine Pemberton; Lena Ripa; R Ian Storer; Helena Käck
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Enrichment of chemical libraries docked to protein conformational ensembles and application to aldehyde dehydrogenase 2.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Cameron D Buchman; Liwei Li; Thomas D Hurley; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Is It Reliable to Use Common Molecular Docking Methods for Comparing the Binding Affinities of Enantiomer Pairs for Their Protein Target?

Authors:  David Ramírez; Julio Caballero
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Validating and enabling phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHGDH) as a target for fragment-based drug discovery in PHGDH-amplified breast cancer.

Authors:  Judith E Unterlass; Arnaud Baslé; Timothy J Blackburn; Julie Tucker; Céline Cano; Martin E M Noble; Nicola J Curtin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-22

5.  An ultrasensitive high throughput screen for DNA methyltransferase 1-targeted molecular probes.

Authors:  Rebecca L Fagan; Meng Wu; Frédéric Chédin; Charles Brenner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  An Automated Microscale Thermophoresis Screening Approach for Fragment-Based Lead Discovery.

Authors:  Pawel Linke; Kwame Amaning; Melanie Maschberger; Francois Vallee; Valerie Steier; Philipp Baaske; Stefan Duhr; Dennis Breitsprecher; Alexey Rak
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2015-12-02

7.  Flavonoids as CDK1 Inhibitors: Insights in Their Binding Orientations and Structure-Activity Relationship.

Authors:  Carlos Navarro-Retamal; Julio Caballero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Is It Reliable to Take the Molecular Docking Top Scoring Position as the Best Solution without Considering Available Structural Data?

Authors:  David Ramírez; Julio Caballero
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 9.  Key Topics in Molecular Docking for Drug Design.

Authors:  Pedro H M Torres; Ana C R Sodero; Paula Jofily; Floriano P Silva-Jr
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  17β-Estradiol-Induced Conformational Changes of Human Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein: A Computational Molecular Modelling Study.

Authors:  Yong-Xiao Yang; Peng Li; Pan Wang; Bao-Ting Zhu
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.