OBJECTIVE: Motivational interviewing (MI) can promote behavior change, but HIV care providers rarely have training in MI. Little is known about the use of MI-consistent behavior among untrained providers. This study examines the prevalence of such behaviors and their association with patient intentions to reduce high-risk sexual behavior. METHODS: Audio-recorded visits between HIV-infected patients and their healthcare providers were searched for counseling dialog regarding sexual behavior. The association of providers' MI-consistence with patients' statements about behavior change was assessed. RESULTS: Of 417 total encounters, 27 met inclusion criteria. The odds of patient commitment to change were higher when providers used more reflections (p=0.017), used more MI consistent utterances (p=0.044), demonstrated more empathy (p=0.049), and spent more time discussing sexual behavior (p=0.023). Patients gave more statements in favor of change (change talk) when providers used more reflections (p<0.001) and more empathy (p<0.001), even after adjusting for length of relevant dialog. CONCLUSION: Untrained HIV providers do not consistently use MI techniques when counseling patients about sexual risk reduction. However, when they do, their patients are more likely to express intentions to reduce sexual risk behavior. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: MI holds promise as one strategy to reduce transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections.
OBJECTIVE: Motivational interviewing (MI) can promote behavior change, but HIV care providers rarely have training in MI. Little is known about the use of MI-consistent behavior among untrained providers. This study examines the prevalence of such behaviors and their association with patient intentions to reduce high-risk sexual behavior. METHODS: Audio-recorded visits between HIV-infectedpatients and their healthcare providers were searched for counseling dialog regarding sexual behavior. The association of providers' MI-consistence with patients' statements about behavior change was assessed. RESULTS: Of 417 total encounters, 27 met inclusion criteria. The odds of patient commitment to change were higher when providers used more reflections (p=0.017), used more MI consistent utterances (p=0.044), demonstrated more empathy (p=0.049), and spent more time discussing sexual behavior (p=0.023). Patients gave more statements in favor of change (change talk) when providers used more reflections (p<0.001) and more empathy (p<0.001), even after adjusting for length of relevant dialog. CONCLUSION: Untrained HIV providers do not consistently use MI techniques when counseling patients about sexual risk reduction. However, when they do, their patients are more likely to express intentions to reduce sexual risk behavior. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: MI holds promise as one strategy to reduce transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections.
Authors: John S Baer; David B Rosengren; Christopher W Dunn; Elizabeth A Wells; Richard L Ogle; Bryan Hartzler Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2004-01-07 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Stephen F Morin; Kimberly A Koester; Wayne T Steward; Andre Maiorana; Marisa McLaughlin; Janet J Myers; Karen Vernon; Margaret A Chesney Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2004-08-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Gary Marks; Jean L Richardson; Nicole Crepaz; Susan Stoyanoff; Joel Milam; Carol Kemper; Robert A Larsen; Robert Bolan; Penny Weismuller; Harry Hollander; Allen McCutchan Journal: AIDS Date: 2002-09-27 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Christopher W Kahler; Amy J Caswell; M Barton Laws; Justin Walthers; Molly Magill; Nadine R Mastroleo; Chanelle J Howe; Timothy Souza; Ira Wilson; Kendall Bryant; Peter M Monti Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-05-02
Authors: Michael Barton Laws; Gary S Rose; Mary Catherine Beach; Yoojin Lee; William S Rogers; Alyssa Bianca Velasco; Ira B Wilson Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2015-02-23
Authors: Tabor E Flickinger; Somnath Saha; Debra Roter; P Todd Korthuis; Victoria Sharp; Jonathan Cohn; Richard D Moore; Karen S Ingersoll; Mary Catherine Beach Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2015-08-20
Authors: Marya Gwadz; Sabrina R Cluesman; Robert Freeman; Linda M Collins; Caroline Dorsen; Robert L Hawkins; Charles M Cleland; Leo Wilton; Amanda S Ritchie; Karen Torbjornsen; Noelle R Leonard; Belkis Y Martinez; Elizabeth Silverman; Khadija Israel; Alexandra Kutnick Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2022-07-16
Authors: Omar Sued; Isabel Cassetti; Diego Cecchini; Pedro Cahn; Lina Bofill de Murillo; Stephen M Weiss; Lissa N Mandell; Manasi Soni; Deborah L Jones Journal: Trials Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 2.279