Angeline S T Seah1,2, Fiona Tan3, Subramaniam Srinivas4,5,6, Huei Yei Wu7, Konstadina Griva8. 1. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. 2. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. 3. Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore. 4. Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. 5. Department of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. 6. Division of Nephrology, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore. 7. Department of Palliative Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. 8. Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dialysis prolongs the life of people with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), but for patients who are elderly and suffer multiple comorbid illnesses the benefits of dialysis may be outweighed by its negative consequences. Non-dialytic conservative management has therefore become an alternative treatment route, yet little is known on patients' experience with choosing end-of-life treatment. AIMS: To gain insight into the decision-making process leading to opting out of dialysis and the experience with conservative non-dialytic management from the patients' perspective. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was undertaken as the framework for data analysis. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: N = 9 ESRD participants who have taken the decision to forego dialysis were recruited from the advanced care programme under the National Healthcare Group, Singapore. RESULTS: Participants discussed life since ESRD diagnosis, and the personal and contextual factors that led them to choose conservative management. The perceived physical and financial burden of dialysis both for the individual but most importantly for their family, uncertainty over likely gains over risks which were fuelled by communication of negative dialysis stories of others, coupled with sense of life completion and achievement led them to refuse dialysis. All participants took ownership of their decision despite contrary advice by doctors and were content with their decision and current management. CONCLUSIONS: Study highlights the factors driving patients' decisions for conservative non-dialytic management over dialysis to allow medical professionals to offer appropriate support to patients through their decision-making process and in caring them for the rest of their lives.
BACKGROUND: Dialysis prolongs the life of people with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), but for patients who are elderly and suffer multiple comorbid illnesses the benefits of dialysis may be outweighed by its negative consequences. Non-dialytic conservative management has therefore become an alternative treatment route, yet little is known on patients' experience with choosing end-of-life treatment. AIMS: To gain insight into the decision-making process leading to opting out of dialysis and the experience with conservative non-dialytic management from the patients' perspective. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was undertaken as the framework for data analysis. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: N = 9 ESRDparticipants who have taken the decision to forego dialysis were recruited from the advanced care programme under the National Healthcare Group, Singapore. RESULTS:Participants discussed life since ESRD diagnosis, and the personal and contextual factors that led them to choose conservative management. The perceived physical and financial burden of dialysis both for the individual but most importantly for their family, uncertainty over likely gains over risks which were fuelled by communication of negative dialysis stories of others, coupled with sense of life completion and achievement led them to refuse dialysis. All participants took ownership of their decision despite contrary advice by doctors and were content with their decision and current management. CONCLUSIONS: Study highlights the factors driving patients' decisions for conservative non-dialytic management over dialysis to allow medical professionals to offer appropriate support to patients through their decision-making process and in caring them for the rest of their lives.
Authors: Carolyn E Schwartz; Rita Bode; Nicholas Repucci; Janine Becker; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Peter M Fayers Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2006-09-26 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Annemieke Visser; Geke J Dijkstra; Daphne Kuiper; Paul E de Jong; Casper F M Franssen; Ron T Gansevoort; Gerbrand J Izaks; Kitty J Jager; Sijmen A Reijneveld Journal: J Nephrol Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.902
Authors: Sara N Davison; Adeera Levin; Alvin H Moss; Vivekanand Jha; Edwina A Brown; Frank Brennan; Fliss E M Murtagh; Saraladevi Naicker; Michael J Germain; Donal J O'Donoghue; Rachael L Morton; Gregorio T Obrador Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Ikumi Okamoto; Sarah Tonkin-Crine; Hugh Rayner; Fliss E M Murtagh; Ken Farrington; Fergus Caskey; Charles Tomson; Fiona Loud; Roger Greenwood; Donal J O'Donoghue; Paul Roderick Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-11-11 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Roberto Pecoits-Filho; Ikechi G Okpechi; Jo-Ann Donner; David C H Harris; Harith M Aljubori; Aminu K Bello; Ezequiel Bellorin-Font; Fergus J Caskey; Allan Collins; Alfonso M Cueto-Manzano; John Feehally; Bak Leong Goh; Kitty J Jager; Masaomi Nangaku; Muhibur Rahman; Manisha Sahay; Abdulkarim Saleh; Laura Sola; Rumeyza Turan Kazancioglu; Rachael C Walker; Robert Walker; Qiang Yao; Xueqing Yu; Ming-Hui Zhao; David W Johnson Journal: Kidney Int Suppl (2011) Date: 2020-02-19
Authors: Wouter R Verberne; Wanda S Konijn; Karen Prantl; Janneke Dijkers; Margriet T Roskam; Johannes J M van Delden; Willem Jan W Bos Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Javier Roberti; Amanda Cummings; Michelle Myall; Jonathan Harvey; Kate Lippiett; Katherine Hunt; Federico Cicora; Juan Pedro Alonso; Carl R May Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Sarah Tonkin-Crine; Ikumi Okamoto; Geraldine M Leydon; Fliss E M Murtagh; Ken Farrington; Fergus Caskey; Hugh Rayner; Paul Roderick Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 8.860