| Literature DB >> 23647786 |
Christiane Gaudreau1, Melissa Helferty, Jean-Loup Sylvestre, Robert Allard, Pierre A Pilon, Michel Poisson, Sadjia Bekal.
Abstract
During September 2010-November 2011, a cluster of erythromycin-susceptible, tetracycline- and ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter coli pulsovar 1 infections was documented, involving 10 case-patients, in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The findings suggested sexual transmission of an enteric infection among men who have sex with men.Entities:
Keywords: Campylobacter coli; Canada; Quebec; antimicrobial resistance; bacteria; emergence; enteric infections; homosexuality; men; men who have sex with men
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23647786 PMCID: PMC3647503 DOI: 10.3201/eid1905.121344
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Figure 1Number of cases of Campylobacter coli infection reported to Montreal Public Health, Quebec, Canada, 2010–2011. PFGE, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
Figure 2Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns of erythromycin-susceptible, tetracycline- and ciprofloxacin-resistant, Campylobacter coli for SmaI (19 isolates) and KpnI (10 isolates) enzymes, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2010–2011. Scale bar indicates percent similarity. p, pulsovar.
Statistically significant differences between case-patients with outbreak-related Campylobacter coli pulsovar 1 (n = 10) and nonoutbreak C. coli (n = 30) infections, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2010–2011*
| Characteristic | No. outbreak case-patients | No. nonoutbreak case-patients | OR (95% CI) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male sex, n = 40 | 10/10 | 17/30 | 16.20 (1.88–139.00) | 0.010 |
| Age 20– 59 y, n = 40 | 10/10 | 17/30 | 16.20 (1.88–139.00) | 0.010 |
| Had sexual relations within the incubation period, n = 23 | 6/6 | 7/17 | 18.20 (1.87–177.00) | 0.017 |
| MSM, n = 17 | 9/10 | 0/7 | 95.00 (8.29–1,089.00) | 0.0001 |
| HIV positive, n = 15 | 8/9 | 0/6 | 73.67 (6.09–891.00) | 0.001 |
*OR, odds ratio; MSM, men who have sex with men.
Antimicrobial drug susceptibility results for Campylobacter coli pulsovar 1 isolates from 10 patients, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2010–2011*
| Antimicrobial agent† | MIC (mg/L) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Erythromycin | 2–4 | S |
| Azithromycin | 0.25–0.5 | S |
| Tetracycline | 128–256 | R |
| Ciprofloxacin | >32 | R |
| Nalidixic acid | >256 | R |
| Ampicillin | 2–4 | S |
| Gentamicin | 0.5–1 | S |
| Cefotaxime | >32 | R |
| Imipenem | 0.06–0.12 | S |
| Clindamycin | 0.25–0.5 | S |
| Chloramphenicol | 2–4 | S |
| Tigecycline | ≤0.015 | NA |
| β-lactamase‡ | Negative | – |
*S, susceptible; R, resistant; NA, not available; –, not applicable. †The susceptibility and resistance breakpoints were Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Campylobacter breakpoints for erythromycin, tetracycline and ciprofloxacin (), National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System Campylobacter breakpoints for azithromycin and clindamycin (), no breakpoints available for tigecycline and CLSI Enterobacteriaceae breakpoints for the 6 other antimicrobial agents (). ‡β-lactamase susceptibility was determined as described ().