Literature DB >> 23647617

The Self-Rating Scale of Self-Directed Learning (SRSSDL): a factor analysis of the Italian version.

Lucia Cadorin1, Guido Bortoluzzi, Alvisa Palese.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development of self-directed learning (SDL) is a growing priority among nurses and other health care workers: they need to be prepared in order for their university education to be effective and relevant to their lifelong learning. To learn in a self-directed manner, it is necessary to develop an awareness of one's ability to self-learn and then to implement appropriate and effective strategies; progress must be assessed using validated measurement tools.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the factor structure of the Italian version of the Self-Rating Scale of Self-directed Learning (SRSSDL(Ita)), and to provide evidence of its validity.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional design was undertaken. PARTICIPANTS: Given that the instrument is composed of 60 items, a total of 600 to 900 participants were targeted. In addition, according to the theoretical assumption that self-directed learning - as a crucial component of lifelong learning - is a measurable skill that is developed across the individual's professional life, a maximum variation sample was examined. Therefore, 847 participants were involved, including 453 nurses, 141 radiology technicians, 182 nursing students and 68 radiology technician students.
METHODS: Principal component analysis and factor analysis were performed.
RESULTS: The Italian version of the SRSSDL Scale consists of 40 items composed of eight factors: Awareness (α=0.805), Attitudes (α=0.778), Motivation (α=0.789), Learning Strategies (α=0.789), Learning Methods (α=0.781), Learning Activities (α=0.676), Interpersonal Skills (α=0.684), and Constructing Knowledge (α=0.732).
CONCLUSIONS: The SRSSDLIta consists of 40 items across eight factors. The shorter Italian version might reduce the time needed to complete, thereby making the tool faster and easier to use.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Factor analysis; Health-care students; Health-care workers; Instrument; Italy; Nursing; Self-directed learning; Tool

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23647617     DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Educ Today        ISSN: 0260-6917            Impact factor:   3.442


  6 in total

1.  An Initial Validation Study of the Self-Rating Scale of Self-Directed Learning for Pharmacy Education.

Authors:  Linda S Behar-Horenstein; Diane E Beck; Yu Su
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 2.  Instruments evaluating the self-directed learning abilities among nursing students and nurses: a systematic review of psychometric properties.

Authors:  Lucia Cadorin; Valentina Bressan; Alvisa Palese
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Nursing students' self-directed learning abilities and related factors at graduation: A multi-country cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Laura Visiers-Jiménez; Alvisa Palese; Anna Brugnolli; Lucia Cadorin; Leena Salminen; Helena Leino-Kilpi; Eliisa Löyttyniemi; Jana Nemcová; Célia Simão de Oliveira; Marília Rua; Renáta Zeleníková; Satu Kajander-Unkuri
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2022-02-13

Review 4.  Self-directed Learning Theory to Practice: A Footstep towards the Path of being a Life-long Learne.

Authors:  Kailash Charokar; Puja Dulloo
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2022-07

5.  The validity and reliability of the self-directed learning instrument (SDLI) in mainland Chinese nursing students.

Authors:  Wang-Qin Shen; Hong-Lin Chen; Yan Hu
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Concurrent validity of self-rating scale of self-directed learning and self-directed learning instrument among Italian nursing students.

Authors:  Lucia Cadorin; Su-Fen Cheng; Alvisa Palese
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2016-03-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.