Literature DB >> 23647416

Deciding in the dark: age differences in intuitive risk judgment.

Elizabeth P Shulman1, Elizabeth Cauffman2.   

Abstract

Elevated levels of risky behavior in adolescence may signal developmental change in unconscious appraisal of risk. Yet, prior research examining adolescent risk judgment has used tasks that elicit conscious deliberation. The present study, in contrast, attempts to characterize age differences in (less conscious) intuitive impressions of risk. Participants (N = 282; ages 10-30) were presented with depictions of a range of risky and nonrisky activities. They were given 2.5 s to rate each activity on a continuous scale ranging from "bad idea" (low-risk favorability) to "good idea" (high-risk favorability). A curvilinear pattern was found, such that favorability ratings increased across adolescence and peaked around age 20. These results pose a challenge to developmental models that view early adolescence as the period of greatest predisposition toward risk taking; however, they are fairly consistent with age patterns for actual risk taking, at least with respect to crime, binge drinking, and unwanted pregnancy. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23647416     DOI: 10.1037/a0032778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  5 in total

1.  The age-crime curve in adolescence and early adulthood is not due to age differences in economic status.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Shulman; Laurence D Steinberg; Alex R Piquero
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2013-04-18

Review 2.  Adolescent brain development in normality and psychopathology.

Authors:  Monica Luciana
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2013-11

3.  Social influence on risk perception during adolescence.

Authors:  Lisa J Knoll; Lucía Magis-Weinberg; Maarten Speekenbrink; Sarah-Jayne Blakemore
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-03-25

Review 4.  Mind the gap: A review and recommendations for statistically evaluating Dual Systems models of adolescent risk behavior.

Authors:  Samuel N Meisel; Whitney D Fosco; Larry W Hawk; Craig R Colder
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 6.464

5.  Epistemic anxiety and epistemic risk.

Authors:  Lilith Newton
Journal:  Synthese       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 1.595

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.