Literature DB >> 23647246

Three-dimensional localization versus fluoroscopically only guided ablations: a meta-analysis.

Mohammed Shurrab1, Avishag Laish-Farkash, Ilan Lashevsky, Florence Morriello, Sheldon Michael Singh, Richard John Schilling, Harindra Channa Wijeysundera, Arnold Pinter, David Newman, Eugene Crystal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Data regarding efficacy and safety of three-dimensional localization systems (3D) are limited. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing combined fluoroscopy- and 3D guided to fluoroscopically-only guided procedures.
DESIGN: A systematic search was performed using multiple databases between 1990 and 2010. Outcomes were acute and long-term success, ablation, procedure and fluoroscopic times, radiation dose (RD), and complications.
RESULTS: Thirteen studies involving 1292 patients were identified. 3D were tested against fluoroscopic guidance in 666 patients for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), atrial flutter (AFL), atrial fibrillation (AF), and ventricular tachycardia (VT). Acute and long-term freedom from arrhythmia was not significantly different between 3D and control for AFL (acute success, 97% vs. 93%, p = 0.57; chronic success, 93% vs. 96%, p = 0.90) or for SVT (acute success, 94% vs. 100%, p = 0.36; chronic success, 88% vs. 88%, p = 0.80). A shorter fluoroscopic time was achieved with 3D in AFL (p < 0.001) and in SVT (p = 0.002). RD was significantly less for both AFL (p = 0.002) and SVT (p = 0.01). Ablation and procedure time and complications were not statistically different.
CONCLUSIONS: Success, procedure time, and complications were similar between fluoroscopy- and 3D-guided ablations. Fluoroscopic time and RD were significantly reduced for ablation of AFL and SVT with 3D.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23647246     DOI: 10.3109/14017431.2013.797099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand Cardiovasc J        ISSN: 1401-7431            Impact factor:   1.589


  2 in total

1.  Electroanatomic mapping systems (CARTO/EnSite NavX) vs. conventional mapping for ablation procedures in a training program.

Authors:  Jorge Romero; Florentino Lupercio; David Goodman-Meza; Juan Carlos Ruiz; David F Briceno; John D Fisher; Jay Gross; Kevin Ferrick; Soo Kim; Luigi Di Biase; Mario J Garcia; Andrew Krumerman
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation of severe drug-resistant arrhythmia guided by Ensite NavX system during pregnancy: Two case reports and literature review.

Authors:  Guangzhi Chen; Ge Sun; Renfan Xu; Xiaomei Chen; Li Yang; Yang Bai; Shanshan Yang; Ping Guo; Yan Zhang; Chunxia Zhao; Dao Wen Wang; Yan Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.