Literature DB >> 23647186

Effect of intermittent feeding, structural components and phytase on performance and behaviour of broiler chickens.

B Svihus1, V B Lund, B Borjgen, M R Bedford, M Bakken.   

Abstract

1. Two experiments were conducted to study the effect of intermittent feeding on performance and the efficacy of an exogenous phytase, and to assess whether intermittent feeding changed the activity pattern of broiler chickens. 2. Broiler chickens were given, either ad libitum or intermittently, a phosphorus deficient pelleted diet containing either coarsely or finely ground oat hulls and either no enzyme or a phytase added from 10 d of age, in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. Ad libitum feeding consisted of continuous access to feed in a room with 18 h of light and 6 h of complete darkness, whereas birds on intermittent feeding had restricted access to feed from 7 d of age, with 4 1-h feeding bouts/d and one 2-h feeding bout/d from d 14. 3. Performance, characteristics of the anterior digestive tract and phosphorus retention were assessed in experiment 1, while in experiment 2, birds were observed during 4-h periods to quantify different behaviours. 4. Intermittent feeding and phytase improved performance, but intermittent feeding did not improve the efficacy of the enzyme added. Ad libitum fed broiler chickens ate and drank on average twice per hour, and spent close to three-quarters of their time resting. Apart from an increased standing and feed searching activity for intermittently fed birds compared to ad libitum fed birds during the last hour before feed was presented, no differences in activity was detected. 5. It was concluded that broiler chickens quickly adapt to intermittent feeding without reduction in final body weight and with improvements in feed efficiency, but without improving the efficacy of dietary phytase. Only small changes occur in the behaviour of intermittently fed birds compared to ad libitum fed birds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23647186     DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2013.772952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  5 in total

1.  Accuracy of Broiler Activity Index as Affected by Sampling Time Interval.

Authors:  Xiao Yang; Yang Zhao; George T Tabler
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Feed intake pattern of broiler chickens under intermittent lighting: Do birds eat in the dark?

Authors:  Inês Rodrigues; Mingan Choct
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2018-12-27

Review 3.  Role of Feed Processing on Gut Health and Function in Pigs and Poultry: Conundrum of Optimal Particle Size and Hydrothermal Regimens.

Authors:  Elijah G Kiarie; Alisha Mills
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-02-19

4.  Research Note: Effect of stocking density on crop fill progression in broilers grown to 14 d.

Authors:  John Linhoss; Joseph Purswell; Christopher Magee; Daniel Chesser
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Effect of feeding frequency on the growth performance, carcass traits, and apparent nutrient digestibility in geese.

Authors:  Z L Liu; J J Xue; X F Huang; Y Luo; M R Liang; C J Li; Q G Wang; C Wang
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.352

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.