Literature DB >> 23646321

Retention: type, duration and need for common guidelines. A survey of Norwegian orthodontists.

Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic1, Lisen Espeland, Arild Stenvik.   

Abstract

AIMS: To survey retention protocols and need for practical retention guidelines among orthodontists in Norway and to compare the results with similar studies in other countries.
METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to all members of the Norwegian Association of Orthodontists. It included questions about their background and their current retention protocol, as well as their perceived need for common retention guidelines.
RESULTS: The response rate was 77.7% (69.3% males and 30.7% females). The most common maxillary retainer was a combination of a fixed and removable retainer, followed by a clear thermoplastic retainer. In the mandible, a fixed retainer bonded to all anterior teeth was most common (66.4%). Retention in the maxilla lasted 2 to 3 years (34.7%) or 3 to 5 years (23.8%). In the mandible, 41.5% of the orthodontists left the retainer in place for >5 years. When retention lasted more than 3 years, 70% of the orthodontists left the responsibility for retainer checkups to the patients or the general practitioners. The main reason for choosing a certain retention protocol was clinical experience (57.4%). Only 3.5% of the orthodontists based their protocols on information from the literature. Half?of the orthodontists, significantly women, expressed a need for common retention guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: In Norway, bonded retainers alone were reported to be most commonly used in the mandible, while bonded retainers used in combination with a removable retainer appear to be the most commonly used appliances in the maxilla. This is similar to the most frequently used retainers in other countries, but there are disparities in duration and follow-up protocols. Most female orthodontists desire common retention guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23646321     DOI: 10.11607/ortho.964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthodontics (Chic.)        ISSN: 2160-2999


  17 in total

1.  Performance of clear vacuum-formed thermoplastic retainers depending on retention protocol: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eleftherios G Kaklamanos; Maria Kourakou; Dimitrios Kloukos; Ioannis Doulis; Smaragda Kavvadia
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Factors influencing fixed retention practices in German-speaking Switzerland: A survey.

Authors:  Sina N Arnold; Nikolaos Pandis; Raphael Patcas
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Stability of anterior tooth alignment 10 years out of retention.

Authors:  Ragnar Bjering; Leiv Sandvik; Marit Midtbø; Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Survey on Retention Protocols Among Turkish Orthodontists.

Authors:  Aylin Paşaoğlu; Işıl Aras; Ali Mert; Aynur Aras
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2016-09-01

5.  Approaches of Turkish Dentists in Cases of Orthodontic Lingual Retainer Failures.

Authors:  Abdurahman Küçükönder; Ömer Hatipoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-09-28

6.  Anterior tooth alignment: A comparison of orthodontic retention regimens 5 years posttreatment.

Authors:  Ragnar Bjering; Kari Birkeland; Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  A survey on retention practice among orthodontists in Malaysia.

Authors:  Norma Ab Rahman; Tze Fui Low; Nur Shaheera Idris
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Orthodontic retention and the role of the general dental practitioner.

Authors:  Charlotte Molyneaux; Jonathan R Sandy; Anthony J Ireland
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 1.626

9.  Retention practices and factors affecting retainer choice among orthodontists in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Thikriat S Al-Jewair; Mohammad A Hamidaddin; Hamdan M Alotaibi; Nasser D Alqahtani; Sahar F Albarakati; Eman A Alkofide; Khalid A Al-Moammar
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.484

10.  A survey of protocols and trends in orthodontic retention.

Authors:  Alvyda Andriekute; Arunas Vasiliauskas; Antanas Sidlauskas
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.