Literature DB >> 23646095

Effects of Leaflet Stiffness on In Vitro Dynamic Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Leaflet Shape.

Hiroatsu Sugimoto1, Michael S Sacks.   

Abstract

Advances in the development of replacement heart valves require a deeper understanding of the valve dynamics. In the present study, dynamic aortic valve (AV) leaflet geometries were quantified in vitro using a structured laser-light imaging system (Iyengar et al., ABME 29(11):963-973, 2001). Native AV leaflets were first imaged under simulated physiological flow conditions within a rigid glass conduit with simulated anatomic sinuses. Next, the valve/glass conduit combination was removed from the loop and immersed in a 0.625% aqueous glutaraldehyde solution at room temperature for 24 h to produce a bioprosthetic heart valve (BHV). The BHV leaflets were then re-imaged under identical flow conditions while kept in the same position in the glass conduit to minimize artifacts associated with removal/reinsertion of the valve. We observed that: (1) the native leaflet exhibited small, high frequency shifts in shape; (2) the BHV leaflet demonstrated a more stabile shape, as well as focal regions of prolonged, high curvature; (3) the BHV leaflet opened and closed faster by ~10 ms compared to native leaflet; (4) in both the BHV and native states, the AV opened from basal region leading to free edge (5) when closing, both the native and BHV close with both free edge and circumferential together. The high bending observed in the BHV leaflet correlated with known locations of tissue deterioration previously reported in our laboratory. Thus, in order to minimize leaflet tissue damage, methods of chemical modification utilized in BHVs that maintain leaflet flexibility are necessary to minimize the onset and progression of tissue damage. We conclude that leaflet stiffness can have a considerable effect on dynamic valve motion, and can induce deleterious bending behaviors that may be associated with tissue breakdown and valve failure. Moreover, these unique data can provide much needed quantitative information for computational simulation of heart valve leaflet stiffness on heart valve function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic; Cardiac valve bioprostheses; Curvature; Geometry; Imaging; Valve

Year:  2013        PMID: 23646095      PMCID: PMC3640301          DOI: 10.1007/s13239-013-0117-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol        ISSN: 1869-408X            Impact factor:   2.495


  36 in total

1.  Fatigue-induced changes in bioprosthetic heart valve three-dimensional geometry and the relation to tissue damage.

Authors:  D B Smith; M S Sacks; P M Pattany; R Schroeder
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  1999-01

2.  Structural changes in glutaraldehyde-treated porcine heterografts used as substitute cardiac valves. Transmission and scanning electron microscopic observations in 12 patients.

Authors:  V J Ferrans; T L Spray; M E Billingham; W C Roberts
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Influence of stent height upon stresses on the cusps of closed bioprosthetic valves.

Authors:  M S Hamid; H N Sabbah; P D Stein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Stability and function of glycosaminoglycans in porcine bioprosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  Joshua J Lovekamp; Dan T Simionescu; Jeremy J Mercuri; Brett Zubiate; Michael S Sacks; Narendra R Vyavahare
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  In vivo 3-D reconstruction and geometric characterization of the right ventricular free wall.

Authors:  M S Sacks; C J Chuong; G H Templeton; R Peshock
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Regional analysis of dynamic deformation characteristics of native aortic valve leaflets.

Authors:  Michael Weiler; Choon Hwai Yap; Kartik Balachandran; Muralidhar Padala; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Triglycidylamine crosslinking of porcine aortic valve cusps or bovine pericardium results in improved biocompatibility, biomechanics, and calcification resistance: chemical and biological mechanisms.

Authors:  Jeanne M Connolly; Ivan Alferiev; Jocelyn N Clark-Gruel; Naomi Eidelman; Michael Sacks; Elizabeth Palmatory; Allyson Kronsteiner; Suzanne Defelice; Jie Xu; Rachit Ohri; Navneet Narula; Narendra Vyavahare; Robert J Levy
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Cyclic loading response of bioprosthetic heart valves: effects of fixation stress state on the collagen fiber architecture.

Authors:  Sarah M Wells; Tiffany Sellaro; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  On the in vivo deformation of the mitral valve anterior leaflet: effects of annular geometry and referential configuration.

Authors:  Rouzbeh Amini; Chad E Eckert; Kevin Koomalsingh; Jeremy McGarvey; Masahito Minakawa; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  Pathology of substitute heart valves: new concepts and developments.

Authors:  F J Schoen; R J Levy
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.620

View more
  8 in total

1.  Fluid-structure interaction analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves: Significance of arterial wall deformation.

Authors:  Ming-Chen Hsu; David Kamensky; Yuri Bazilevs; Michael S Sacks; Thomas J R Hughes
Journal:  Comput Mech       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  An immersogeometric variational framework for fluid-structure interaction: application to bioprosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  David Kamensky; Ming-Chen Hsu; Dominik Schillinger; John A Evans; Ankush Aggarwal; Yuri Bazilevs; Michael S Sacks; Thomas J R Hughes
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 6.756

3.  Interlayer micromechanics of the aortic heart valve leaflet.

Authors:  Rachel M Buchanan; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2013-11-30

Review 4.  Mechanical considerations for polymeric heart valve development: Biomechanics, materials, design and manufacturing.

Authors:  Richard L Li; Jonathan Russ; Costas Paschalides; Giovanni Ferrari; Haim Waisman; Jeffrey W Kysar; David Kalfa
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  Biomechanical Behavior of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Heterograft Tissues: Characterization, Simulation, and Performance.

Authors:  Joao S Soares; Kristen R Feaver; Will Zhang; David Kamensky; Ankush Aggarwal; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.495

6.  Fluid-Structure Interaction Models of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Dynamics in an Experimental Pulse Duplicator.

Authors:  Jae H Lee; Alex D Rygg; Ebrahim M Kolahdouz; Simone Rossi; Stephen M Retta; Nandini Duraiswamy; Lawrence N Scotten; Brent A Craven; Boyce E Griffith
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Dynamic measurement of centering forces on transvalvular cannulas.

Authors:  Martin Stoiber; Philipp Aigner; Christian Grasl; Michael Röhrich; Francesco Moscato; Heinrich Schima
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.094

8.  Recellularization of a novel off-the-shelf valve following xenogenic implantation into the right ventricular outflow tract.

Authors:  Ryan S Hennessy; Jason L Go; Rebecca R Hennessy; Brandon J Tefft; Soumen Jana; Nicholas J Stoyles; Mohammed A Al-Hijji; Jeremy J Thaden; Sorin V Pislaru; Robert D Simari; John M Stulak; Melissa D Young; Amir Lerman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.