Literature DB >> 23645625

Impact of time to maternal interview on interview responses in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Sarah C Tinker1, Cassandra Gibbs, Matthew J Strickland, Owen J Devine, Krista S Crider, Martha M Werler, Marlene T Anderka, Jennita Reefhuis.   

Abstract

Prenatal exposures often are assessed using retrospective interviews. Time from exposure to interview may influence data accuracy. We investigated the association of time to interview (TTI) with aspects of interview responses in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, a population-based case-control study of birth defects in 10 US states. Mothers completed a computer-assisted telephone interview 1.5-24 months after their estimated date of delivery. Proxy metrics for interview quality were whether certain exposures were reported, whether the start month of reported medication use or illness was reported, or whether responses were missing. Interaction by case status was assessed. Interviews were completed with 30,542 mothers (22,366 cases and 8,176 controls) who gave birth between 1997 and 2007. Mothers of cases were interviewed later than were mothers of controls (11.7 months vs. 9.5 months, respectively). In adjusted analyses, having a TTI that was greater than 6 months was associated with only a few aspects of interview responses (e.g., start month of pseudoephedrine use). Interaction by case-control status was observed for some exposures; mothers of controls had a greater reduction in interview quality with increased TTI in these instances (e.g., report of morning sickness, start month of acetaminophen use and ibuprofen use). The results suggest that TTI might impact interview responses; however, the impact may be minimal and specific to the type of exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bias (epidemiology); case-control studies; interviews as topic

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23645625      PMCID: PMC4357803          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  15 in total

1.  Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Stanley K Henshaw
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2006-06

2.  Reports of birthweight by adolescents and their mothers: comparing accuracy and identifying correlates.

Authors:  Victoria C Lucia; Zhehui Luo; Joseph C Gardiner; Nigel Paneth; Naomi Breslau
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.980

3.  An investigation of report bias in a case-control study of pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  S G Mackenzie; A Lippman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  The National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Authors:  P W Yoon; S A Rasmussen; M C Lynberg; C A Moore; M Anderka; S L Carmichael; P Costa; C Druschel; C A Hobbs; P A Romitti; P H Langlois; L D Edmonds
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Etiologic heterogeneity of neural tube defects: clues from epidemiology.

Authors:  M J Khoury; J D Erickson; L M James
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Drug certainty-response in interview-based studies.

Authors:  Wai-Ping Yau; Kueiyu Joshua Lin; Martha M Werler; Carol Louik; Allen A Mitchell; Sonia Hernández-Díaz
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.890

7.  Accuracy and reliability of maternal recall of infant birth weight among older women.

Authors:  Janet M Catov; Anne B Newman; Sheryl F Kelsey; James M Roberts; Kim C Sutton-Tyrrell; Melissa Garcia; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Francis Tylavsky; Roberta B Ness
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Medical record validation of maternally reported birth characteristics and pregnancy-related events: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.

Authors:  J E Olson; X O Shu; J A Ross; T Pendergrass; L L Robison
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Mothers tended to overreport categorical infant birth weight of their children.

Authors:  Chung-Yi Li; Jung-Nan Wei; Tsung-Hsueh Lu; Lee-Ming Chuang; Fung-Chang Sung
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  The retrospective measurement of prenatal and perinatal events: accuracy of maternal recall.

Authors:  Stephen L Buka; Jill M Goldstein; Eleni Spartos; Ming T Tsuang
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  11 in total

1.  Using insurance claims data to identify and estimate critical periods in pregnancy: An application to antidepressants.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Ailes; Regina M Simeone; April L Dawson; Emily E Petersen; Suzanne M Gilboa
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2016-11

2.  Does Maternal Exposure to Secondhand Tobacco Smoke During Pregnancy Increase the Risk for Preterm or Small-for-Gestational Age Birth?

Authors:  Adrienne T Hoyt; Mark A Canfield; Paul A Romitti; Lorenzo D Botto; Marlene T Anderka; Sergey V Krikov; Marcia L Feldkamp
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-10

3.  Validation of maternal recall of early pregnancy medication exposure using prospective diary data.

Authors:  Alexandra C Sundermann; Katherine E Hartmann; Sarah H Jones; Eric S Torstenson; Digna R Velez Edwards
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Depression, Anxiety, and Pharmacotherapy Around the Time of Pregnancy in Hawaii.

Authors:  Emily K Roberson; Eric L Hurwitz; Dongmei Li; Robert V Cooney; Alan R Katz; Abby C Collier
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2016-08

5.  The role of parental and perinatal characteristics on Langerhans cell histiocytosis: characterizing increased risk among Hispanics.

Authors:  Erin C Peckham-Gregory; Kenneth L McClain; Carl E Allen; Michael E Scheurer; Philip J Lupo
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Women's periconceptional diet and risk of biliary atresia in offspring.

Authors:  Suzan L Carmichael; Chen Ma; Alissa R Van Zutphen; Cynthia A Moore; Gary M Shaw
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  A population-based case-control study of the association between weather-related extreme heat events and orofacial clefts.

Authors:  Aida Soim; Scott C Sheridan; Syni-An Hwang; Wan-Hsiang Hsu; Sarah C Fisher; Gary M Shaw; Marcia L Feldkamp; Paul A Romitti; Jennita Reefhuis; Peter H Langlois; Marilyn L Browne; Shao Lin
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.344

8.  Population-based case-control study of the association between weather-related extreme heat events and neural tube defects.

Authors:  Aida Soim; Shao Lin; Scott C Sheridan; Syni-An Hwang; Wan-Hsiang Hsu; Thomas J Luben; Gary M Shaw; Marcia L Feldkamp; Paul A Romitti; Jennita Reefhuis; Peter H Langlois; Marilyn L Browne
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Prenatal diagnosis of nonsyndromic congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Ailes; Suzanne M Gilboa; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Candice Y Johnson; Charlotte A Hobbs; Adolfo Correa; Margaret A Honein
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  The Baby Hearts Study - a case-control methodology with data linkage to evaluate risk and protective factors for congenital heart disease.

Authors:  N McCullough; H Dolk; M Loane; B M Lagan; F Casey; B Craig
Journal:  Int J Popul Data Sci       Date:  2019-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.