IMPORTANCE: Age-related cataract is a leading cause of visual impairment in the United States. The prevalence of age-related cataract is increasing, with an estimated 30.1 million Americans likely to be affected by 2020. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether daily oral supplementation with lutein/zeaxanthin affects the risk for cataract surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2), a multicenter, double-masked clinical trial, enrolled 4203 participants, aged 50 to 85 years, at risk for progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to daily placebo; lutein/zeaxanthin, 10mg/2mg; omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, 1 g; or a combination to evaluate the effects on the primary outcome of progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cataract surgery was documented at annual study examination with the presence of pseudophakia or aphakia, or reported during telephone calls at 6-month intervals between study visits. Annual best-corrected visual acuity testing was performed. A secondary outcome of AREDS2 was to evaluate the effects of lutein/zeaxanthin on the subsequent need for cataract surgery. RESULTS:A total of 3159AREDS2 participants were phakic in at least 1 eye and 1389 of 6027 study eyes underwent cataract surgery during the study, with median follow-up of 4.7 years. The 5-year probability of progression to cataract surgery in the no lutein/zeaxanthin group was 24%. For lutein/zeaxanthin vs no lutein/zeaxanthin, the hazard ratios for progression to cataract surgery was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.84-1.10; P = .54). For participants in the lowest quintile of dietary intake of lutein/zeaxanthin, the hazard ratio comparing lutein/zeaxanthin vs no lutein/zeaxanthin for progression to cataract surgery was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.48-0.96; P = .03). The hazard ratio for 3 or more lines of vision loss was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.93-1.13; P = .61 for lutein/zeaxanthin vs no lutein/zeaxanthin). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Daily supplementation with lutein/zeaxanthin had no statistically significant overall effect on rates of cataract surgery or vision loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00345176.
RCT Entities:
IMPORTANCE: Age-related cataract is a leading cause of visual impairment in the United States. The prevalence of age-related cataract is increasing, with an estimated 30.1 million Americans likely to be affected by 2020. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether daily oral supplementation with lutein/zeaxanthin affects the risk for cataract surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2), a multicenter, double-masked clinical trial, enrolled 4203 participants, aged 50 to 85 years, at risk for progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration. INTERVENTIONS:Participants were randomly assigned to daily placebo; lutein/zeaxanthin, 10mg/2mg; omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, 1 g; or a combination to evaluate the effects on the primary outcome of progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cataract surgery was documented at annual study examination with the presence of pseudophakia or aphakia, or reported during telephone calls at 6-month intervals between study visits. Annual best-corrected visual acuity testing was performed. A secondary outcome of AREDS2 was to evaluate the effects of lutein/zeaxanthin on the subsequent need for cataract surgery. RESULTS: A total of 3159 AREDS2 participants were phakic in at least 1 eye and 1389 of 6027 study eyes underwent cataract surgery during the study, with median follow-up of 4.7 years. The 5-year probability of progression to cataract surgery in the no lutein/zeaxanthin group was 24%. For lutein/zeaxanthin vs no lutein/zeaxanthin, the hazard ratios for progression to cataract surgery was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.84-1.10; P = .54). For participants in the lowest quintile of dietary intake of lutein/zeaxanthin, the hazard ratio comparing lutein/zeaxanthin vs no lutein/zeaxanthin for progression to cataract surgery was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.48-0.96; P = .03). The hazard ratio for 3 or more lines of vision loss was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.93-1.13; P = .61 for lutein/zeaxanthin vs no lutein/zeaxanthin). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Daily supplementation with lutein/zeaxanthin had no statistically significant overall effect on rates of cataract surgery or vision loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00345176.
Authors: Hien T V Vu; Luba Robman; Allison Hodge; Catherine A McCarty; Hugh R Taylor Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: J A Mares-Perlman; B J Lyle; R Klein; A I Fisher; W E Brady; G M VandenLangenberg; J N Trabulsi; M Palta Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2000-11
Authors: Nathan Congdon; Johannes R Vingerling; Barbara E K Klein; Sheila West; David S Friedman; John Kempen; Benita O'Colmain; Suh-Yuh Wu; Hugh R Taylor Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2004-04
Authors: Shaza N Al-Holou; William R Tucker; Elvira Agrón; Traci E Clemons; Robert D Sperduto; Frederick L Ferris; Emily Y Chew Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Amitha Domalpally; Ronald P Danis; Emily Y Chew; Traci E Clemons; Susan Reed; John Paul Sangiovanni; Frederick L Ferris Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Yuliya V Rumyantseva; Elena I Ryabchikova; Anjela Z Fursova; Nataliya G Kolosova Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Binxing Li; Preejith P Vachali; Aruna Gorusupudi; Zhengqing Shen; Hassan Sharifzadeh; Brian M Besch; Kelly Nelson; Madeleine M Horvath; Jeanne M Frederick; Wolfgang Baehr; Paul S Bernstein Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Tanya S Glaser; Lauren E Doss; Grace Shih; Divya Nigam; Robert D Sperduto; Frederick L Ferris; Elvira Agrón; Traci E Clemons; Emily Y Chew Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-05-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Nathan G Lambert; Hanan ElShelmani; Malkit K Singh; Fiona C Mansergh; Michael A Wride; Maximilian Padilla; David Keegan; Ruth E Hogg; Balamurali K Ambati Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Zohar Yehoshua; Carlos Alexandre de Amorim Garcia Filho; Renata Portella Nunes; Giovanni Gregori; Fernando M Penha; Andrew A Moshfeghi; Kang Zhang; Srinivas Sadda; William Feuer; Philip J Rosenfeld Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 12.079