Literature DB >> 2364509

Effect of age on the in vitro reflection coefficient of the aortoiliac bifurcation in humans.

S E Greenwald1, A C Carter, C L Berry.   

Abstract

The local reflection coefficient (r) at the aortoiliac junction was estimated in vessels removed at autopsy from 15 females and 31 males aged 2 months to 88 years by calculating the characteristic impedance (Zc) of the abdominal aorta and the two common iliac arteries. Zc was evaluated for each vessel by measuring cross-sectional area from radiographs and propagation velocity of an isolated pressure impulse generated by a solenoid-driven piston connected to the distal end of the abdominal aorta, and detected at several sites a known distance from the junction. Attenuation coefficients in the aorta were estimated from the peak amplitude of the impulse at these several sites. We observed significant decreases with age in abdominal aortic attenuation coefficient (gamma = 0.053-5 x 10(-4) age [yr], r = -0.42, p less than 0.005), and the area ratio (AR) of the junction (sum of the iliac cross-sectional areas/aortic cross-sectional area) (AR = 0.93-0.002 x age [yr], r = -0.31, p less than 0.05). Bifurcation angle (Angle) and aortic propagation velocity (caorta) increased significantly (angle = 40.2 + 0.26 x age [yr], r = 0.41, p less than 0.01; caorta (ms-1) = 7.59 + 0.175 x age [yr], r = 0.69, p less than 0.0001). No significant association between age and iliac propagation velocity was found. On the basis of area measurements alone, it has been argued that the observed decrease in area ratio with age causes r to become more positive. The lack of age-related changes in iliac propagation velocity (and hence stiffness), an observation confirmed by most of the few reports in the literature, and the large increase in abdominal aortic stiffness, however, greatly outweighed the area ratio changes and caused a significant decline in reflection coefficient from +0.3 in early life to -0.3 in old age. (Reflection coefficient = 0.30-0.0065 x age [yr], r = -0.68, p less than 0.0001). Between the ages of 30 and 60 years, its absolute value was less than 0.1, confirming in vivo work on subjects within this age range. In children, a significant positive reflection at the distal end of the aorta will amplify the pulse wave in this region. As this vessel becomes stiffer with increasing age, amplification will increase, whereas the increasingly negative value of r will partially offset this rise, reducing pulse pressure on either side of the junction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2364509     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.82.1.114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  8 in total

Review 1.  Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Timothy W Secomb
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 9.090

2.  A database of virtual healthy subjects to assess the accuracy of foot-to-foot pulse wave velocities for estimation of aortic stiffness.

Authors:  Marie Willemet; Phil Chowienczyk; Jordi Alastruey
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  The control of blood pressure might be important in delaying progression of arterial aging in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  GeeHee Kim; Ji-Hoon Kim; Keon-Woong Moon; Ki-Dong Yoo; Seung-Hyun Ko; Yu-Bae Ahn; Chul-Min Kim
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  Computational assessment of hemodynamics-based diagnostic tools using a database of virtual subjects: Application to three case studies.

Authors:  Marie Willemet; Samuel Vennin; Jordi Alastruey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Optimized design of an arterial network model reproduces characteristic central and peripheral haemodynamic waveform features of young adults.

Authors:  Avinash Kondiboyina; Hilary A Harrington; Joseph J Smolich; Michael M H Cheung; Jonathan P Mynard
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 6.228

6.  Manipulation of arterial stiffness, wave reflections, and retrograde shear rate in the femoral artery using lower limb external compression.

Authors:  Kevin S Heffernan; Wesley K Lefferts; Ari G Kasprowicz; Brendan J Tarzia; Dick H Thijssen; Tom D Brutsaert
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2013-07-08

7.  Validation of the pulse decomposition analysis algorithm using central arterial blood pressure.

Authors:  Martin C Baruch; Kambiz Kalantari; David W Gerdt; Charles M Adkins
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Vascular Aging and Arterial Stiffness.

Authors:  Luana de Rezende Mikael; Anelise Machado Gomes de Paiva; Marco Mota Gomes; Ana Luiza Lima Sousa; Paulo César Brandão Veiga Jardim; Priscila Valverde de Oliveira Vitorino; Maicon Borges Euzébio; Wátila de Moura Sousa; Weimar Kunz Sebba Barroso
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.000

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.