Literature DB >> 23644867

Which device should be chosen for the percutaneous closure of post-traumatic ventricular septal defects?

Sait Demirkol, Sevket Balta, Mustafa Cakar, Ugur Kucuk.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23644867      PMCID: PMC3611756          DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2013(03)le03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)        ISSN: 1807-5932            Impact factor:   2.365


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, We read with great interest the article “Percutaneous closure of a post-traumatic ventricular septal defect with a patent ductus arteriosus occluder” written by Xi EP et al. (1). The authors aimed to report their experiences with three patients who underwent the percutaneous closure of a post-traumatic ventricular septal defect (VSD) with a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) occluder. They concluded that the closure of a post-traumatic ventricular septal defect using a PDA occluder is feasible, safe, and effective. We believe that these findings will act as a guide for further studies regarding the closure of post-traumatic ventricular septal defects with occluder devices. We wish to make a minor criticism about this study. In the first case, the authors placed a muscular VSD occluder. However, its right plate had an inappropriate configuration; thus, they closed the defect with a PDA occluder. Therefore, they selected the PDA occluder in the two subsequent patients. Although the percutaneous closure of traumatic and postinfarction VSDs can be accomplished with septal occluder devices safely and effectively (2,3), why did they choose the PDA occluder for the other two patients? Additionally, why did they not try to implant a VSD occluder device? In the Discussion section, they indicated that the PDA occluder cannot cause a ventricular outflow tract obstruction. However, all of the patients had muscular VSD, which itself cannot occlude the outflow tract. The percutaneous therapy of structural heart defects has become an alternative approach to surgery in selected patients. The most important considerations before performing the percutaneous closure are whether the defect can be closed via the percutaneous approach and which device should be selected. There has generally been no consensus on the selection of the device. Further studies should be conducted in the development of defect-specific devices, which may result in an improvement in patient outcome.
  3 in total

1.  Primary transcatheter closure of postinfarction ventricular septal defects with the Amplatzer septal occluder- immediate results and up-to 5 years follow-up.

Authors:  M Demkow; W Ruzyllo; C Kepka; Z Chmielak; M Konka; Z Dzielinska; J Wilczynski; Z Juraszynski
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.534

2.  Transcatheter closure of postinfarction ventricular septal defects using the new Amplatzer muscular VSD occluder: Results of a U.S. Registry.

Authors:  Ralf Holzer; David Balzer; Zahid Amin; Carlos E Ruiz; Jeffrey Feinstein; John Bass; Michael Vance; Qi-Ling Cao; Ziyad M Hijazi
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Percutaneous closure of a post-traumatic ventricular septal defect with a patent ductus arteriosus occluder.

Authors:  Er-Ping Xi; Jian Zhu; Shui-Bo Zhu; Gui-Lin Yin; Yong Liu; Yong-Qiang Dong; Yu Zhang; Feng Xia
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.365

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Percutaneous closure of traumatic ventricular septal defects: device selection and reasoning.

Authors:  Jian Zhu; Er-Ping Xi; Shui-Bo Zhu
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.365

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.