Literature DB >> 23644833

"Triangle of safety": anatomic considerations in transvaginal natural orifice surgery.

Kurt Roberts1, Daniel Solomon, Robert Bell, Andrew Duffy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The introduction of transvaginal (TV) natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) brings the loss of traditionally used cutaneous landmarks for safe peritoneal access. This video describes the use of landmarks within the posterior vaginal fornix to define a "triangle of safety" wherein the peritoneal cavity can be accessed while minimizing the risk of injury to surrounding structures.
METHODS: The triangle of safety is best identified in the following way. The cervix and posterior fornix are visualized. Then an imaginary clock located at the base of the cervix is envisioned. The superior two corners of the triangle are represented by the 4 and 8 o'clock positions on this imaginary clock. Sometimes the cervix needs to be grasped and elevated anteriorly so that the inferior apex of the triangle delineated by the center of the rectovaginal fold is better visualized.
RESULTS: During hybrid TV NOTES, the rectovaginal pouch of Douglas is visualized from the umbilicus, and the vaginal port can then be safely passed through the center of the triangle. It is important that the vaginal port should be angled upward, aiming toward the umbilicus to avoid injury to the rectum. During pure TV NOTES, the incision is made with electrocautery from the 5 o'clock position to the 7 o'clock position within the triangle. The peritoneum is sharply entered, and the colpotomy is dilated with the surgeons' fingers.
CONCLUSIONS: The triangle of safety defines a set of landmarks between the base of the cervix and the rectovaginal fold. It allows for a safe TV access for hybrid and pure TV NOTES while minimizing the risk of injury to surrounding structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23644833     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2864-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  3 in total

1.  Pure transvaginal appendectomy versus traditional laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kurt E Roberts; Daniel Solomon; Tamar Mirensky; Dan-Arin Silasi; Andrew J Duffy; Tom Rutherford; Walter E Longo; Robert L Bell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S M Strasberg; M Hertl; N J Soper
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Laparoscopic hernia repair: the anatomic basis.

Authors:  A T Spaw; B W Ennis; L P Spaw
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1991-10
  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Characterization of force and torque interactions during a simulated transgastric appendectomy procedure.

Authors:  Saurabh Dargar; Cecilia Brino; Kai Matthes; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Suvranu De
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Transvaginal cholecystectomy learning curve.

Authors:  Stephanie G Wood; Feng Dai; Susan Dabu-Bondoc; Hosni Mikhael; Nalini Vadivelu; Andrew Duffy; Kurt E Roberts
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A comparison of NOTES transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures based upon task analysis.

Authors:  Arun Nemani; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Jaisa S Olasky; Souheil Adra; Kurt E Roberts; Lucian Panait; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Development of a Haptic Interface for Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery Simulation.

Authors:  Saurabh Dargar; Suvranu De; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.487

5.  A Simple Approach to Specimen Retrieval via Posterior Colpotomy Incision.

Authors:  Lindsay E Clark; Gulden Menderes; Amanda M Tower; Dan-Arin Silasi; Masoud Azodi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.