Kurt Roberts1, Daniel Solomon, Robert Bell, Andrew Duffy. 1. Section of Surgical Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, 40 Temple Street, Suite 7B, New Haven, CT 06510, USA. kurt.roberts@yale.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The introduction of transvaginal (TV) natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) brings the loss of traditionally used cutaneous landmarks for safe peritoneal access. This video describes the use of landmarks within the posterior vaginal fornix to define a "triangle of safety" wherein the peritoneal cavity can be accessed while minimizing the risk of injury to surrounding structures. METHODS: The triangle of safety is best identified in the following way. The cervix and posterior fornix are visualized. Then an imaginary clock located at the base of the cervix is envisioned. The superior two corners of the triangle are represented by the 4 and 8 o'clock positions on this imaginary clock. Sometimes the cervix needs to be grasped and elevated anteriorly so that the inferior apex of the triangle delineated by the center of the rectovaginal fold is better visualized. RESULTS: During hybrid TV NOTES, the rectovaginal pouch of Douglas is visualized from the umbilicus, and the vaginal port can then be safely passed through the center of the triangle. It is important that the vaginal port should be angled upward, aiming toward the umbilicus to avoid injury to the rectum. During pure TV NOTES, the incision is made with electrocautery from the 5 o'clock position to the 7 o'clock position within the triangle. The peritoneum is sharply entered, and the colpotomy is dilated with the surgeons' fingers. CONCLUSIONS: The triangle of safety defines a set of landmarks between the base of the cervix and the rectovaginal fold. It allows for a safe TV access for hybrid and pure TV NOTES while minimizing the risk of injury to surrounding structures.
BACKGROUND: The introduction of transvaginal (TV) natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) brings the loss of traditionally used cutaneous landmarks for safe peritoneal access. This video describes the use of landmarks within the posterior vaginal fornix to define a "triangle of safety" wherein the peritoneal cavity can be accessed while minimizing the risk of injury to surrounding structures. METHODS: The triangle of safety is best identified in the following way. The cervix and posterior fornix are visualized. Then an imaginary clock located at the base of the cervix is envisioned. The superior two corners of the triangle are represented by the 4 and 8 o'clock positions on this imaginary clock. Sometimes the cervix needs to be grasped and elevated anteriorly so that the inferior apex of the triangle delineated by the center of the rectovaginal fold is better visualized. RESULTS: During hybrid TV NOTES, the rectovaginal pouch of Douglas is visualized from the umbilicus, and the vaginal port can then be safely passed through the center of the triangle. It is important that the vaginal port should be angled upward, aiming toward the umbilicus to avoid injury to the rectum. During pure TV NOTES, the incision is made with electrocautery from the 5 o'clock position to the 7 o'clock position within the triangle. The peritoneum is sharply entered, and the colpotomy is dilated with the surgeons' fingers. CONCLUSIONS: The triangle of safety defines a set of landmarks between the base of the cervix and the rectovaginal fold. It allows for a safe TV access for hybrid and pure TV NOTES while minimizing the risk of injury to surrounding structures.
Authors: Kurt E Roberts; Daniel Solomon; Tamar Mirensky; Dan-Arin Silasi; Andrew J Duffy; Tom Rutherford; Walter E Longo; Robert L Bell Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Stephanie G Wood; Feng Dai; Susan Dabu-Bondoc; Hosni Mikhael; Nalini Vadivelu; Andrew Duffy; Kurt E Roberts Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Arun Nemani; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Jaisa S Olasky; Souheil Adra; Kurt E Roberts; Lucian Panait; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 4.584