Literature DB >> 23644606

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the elderly: a review of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry.

Priya Mendiratta1, Jeanne Y Wei, Alberto Gomez, Paula Podrazik, Ann T Riggs, Peter Rycus, Jeffrey Gossett, Parthak Prodhan.   

Abstract

The role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as part of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) among the elderly is not clearly defined. We sought to query the international Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry database to investigate the use of ECMO support among the elderly. The objective of this study was to investigate survival to hospital discharge among the elderly supported on ECMO. The ELSO registry database was queried, identifying all elderly patients (>65 years of age) supported on ECMO for ECPR from 1998 to 2009. The primary outcome variable was survival to hospital discharge. Clinical characteristics between survivors and nonsurvivors were compared using univariate analysis. Ninety-nine elderly patients requiring ECPR were identified from the ELSO registry for the study period. The median age of the cohort was 70 years (range 65-86 years). The median admission to time on ECMO was 32 hours (range 1-998 hours), median time on ECMO was 69 hours (range 1-459 hours), and median time off to discharge for survivors was 587 hours (range 3-2,166 hours). Overall, survival at hospital discharge was 22.2% (22/99). No significant differences were noted between survivors and nonsurvivors for demographics, secondary diagnoses, pre-ECMO variables, complications on ECMO, as well as the type and duration of ECMO support. Among listed comorbidities, only the presence of pre-ECMO acute renal failure was significantly more frequent in nonsurvivors compared with survivors (14 vs. 0; p = 0.04). Survival to hospital discharge among the elderly supported on ECMO is lower than that for younger adult patients (28.7% vs. 40.0%). However, it is higher than that after conventional CPR (17%), suggesting that age should not be a bar against consideration for the use of ECMO in older patients but should be considered on a case-by-case basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23644606     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e31828fd6e5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  10 in total

1.  The dilemma of patient age in decision-making for extracorporeal life support in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Roberto Lorusso; Alain Cariou; Hans Flaatten
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Extracorporeal life support in critically ill adults.

Authors:  Corey E Ventetuolo; Christopher S Muratore
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 3.  [Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Case series of prehospital and in-hospital therapies].

Authors:  M Kippnich; C Lotz; M Kredel; C Schimmer; D Weismann; C Sommer; P Kranke; N Roewer; R M Muellenbach
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  [Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Indications, limitations and practical implementation].

Authors:  D Lunz; A Philipp; M Dolch; F Born; Y A Zausig
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Impact of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation on outcomes of elderly patients who had out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a single-centre retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Tadahiro Goto; Sachiko Morita; Tetsuhisa Kitamura; Tomoaki Natsukawa; Hirotaka Sawano; Yasuyuki Hayashi; Tatsuro Kai
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Predictors of survival and neurologic outcome for adults with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Junhong Wang; Qingbian Ma; Hua Zhang; Shaoyu Liu; Yaan Zheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Effect of interplay between age and low-flow duration on neurologic outcomes of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Hsi-Yu Yu; Chih-Hsien Wang; Nai-Hsin Chi; Shu-Chien Huang; Heng-Wen Chou; Nai-Kuan Chou; Yih-Sharng Chen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  The Patient Selection Criteria for Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Mechanical Oxygenation.

Authors:  Sandeep Banga; Abhiram Challa; Avani R Patel; Shantanu Singh; Vamsi K Emani
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-09-20

9.  Impact of Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity on Hospital Survival and Short-Term Outcome of Patients with Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Authors:  Li-Jung Tseng; Hsi-Yu Yu; Chih-Hsien Wang; Nai-Hsin Chi; Shu-Chien Huang; Heng-Wen Chou; Hsin-Chin Shih; Nai-Kuan Chou; Yih-Sharng Chen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Adult Patients.

Authors:  Akihiko Inoue; Toru Hifumi; Tetsuya Sakamoto; Yasuhiro Kuroda
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.501

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.