Literature DB >> 23644272

Recognizability: a strategy for assessing external validity and for facilitating knowledge transfer in qualitative research.

Hanne Konradsen1, Marit Kirkevold, Karin Olson.   

Abstract

In this article, we argue in favor of quality assessment for qualitative studies and propose using a strategy we have labeled recognizability to assess external validity and facilitate knowledge transfer. To test our idea, we gathered data about recognizability in relation to a specific study on facial disfigurement. Four categories were identified: full recognition; partial recognition; recognition in others; and no recognition. In this article, we show how we used these categories both to evaluate the quality of our study and to assess its external validity. We also discuss the implications of recognizability for knowledge transfer.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23644272     DOI: 10.1097/ANS.0b013e318290209d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci        ISSN: 0161-9268            Impact factor:   1.824


  2 in total

1.  Qualitative Reflections: CASA's Trauma and Attachment Group (TAG) Program for Youth who have Experienced Early Developmental Trauma.

Authors:  Chandra K Ashton; Anna O'Brien-Langer; Karin Olson; Peter H Silverstone
Journal:  J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-03-01

2.  Experiences of Patients Undergoing Bowel Preparation and Colonoscopy: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Sara Shamim; Yvette Lena Margareta Andresen; Henriette Vind Thaysen; Ida Hovdenak Jakobsen; Jannie Nielsen; Anne Kjaergaard Danielsen; Hanne Konradsen
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-02-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.