Literature DB >> 23643715

What elements of the informational, management, and relational continuity are associated with patient satisfaction with rehabilitation care and global rating change?

Francesc Medina-Mirapeix1, Silvana L Oliveira-Sousa, Marta Sobral-Ferreira, Joaquina Montilla-Herrador, Francisco J Jimeno-Serrano, Pilar Escolar-Reina.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the quality of patients' continuity experiences in a population of outpatients receiving postacute rehabilitation care, and to check which elements and types of continuity most strongly determine their satisfaction with care and functional changes.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional self-report survey.
SETTING: Three postacute ambulatory centers in metropolitan areas. PARTICIPANTS: Outpatients (N=218; mean age ± SD, 38.5±11.7y).
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The questionnaire included experiences regarding aspects of informational (transference of information, accumulated knowledge), management (consistency and flexibility of care), and relational (established relation and consistency of provider) continuity, as well as questions concerning patients' sociodemographic characteristics, satisfaction with care, and global rating change.
RESULTS: Respondents indicated more problems in terms of management and relational continuity than in informational continuity. For all patient groups, experiences regarding elements of management continuity (R(2)=15.3%-22.4%), followed by relational continuity (R(2)=14.3%-25.2%), explained most of the variance of satisfaction. Consistency and flexibility of care, together with an established relation, were the most determining elements of satisfaction. Experiences regarding elements of management continuity explained most of the variance of change (18.5%), and flexibility was the most decisive element.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient satisfaction and functional changes are related with experiences in aspects of management continuity, where there is room for improvement. Measures of management continuity may be promising as indicators of continuity, and they should be prioritized.
Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CI; Continuity of patient care; Outpatients; Patient satisfaction; Rehabilitation; confidence interval

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23643715     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  8 in total

1.  The Italian version of the Physical Therapy Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire - [PTPSQ-I(15)]: psychometric properties in a sample of inpatients.

Authors:  Carla Vanti; Paolo Pillastrini; Marco Monticone; Daniele Ceron; Francesca Bonetti; Raffaella Piccarreta; Andrew Guccione; Francesco Saverio Violante
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Continuity of care in hospital rehabilitation services: a qualitative insight from inpatients' experience.

Authors:  Francesc Medina-Mirapeix; Silvana L Oliveira-Sousa; Pilar Escolar-Reina; Marta Sobral-Ferreira; M Carmen Lillo-Navarro; Sean M Collins
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Relationship preferences and experience of primary care patients in continuity of care: a case study in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Chaojie Liu; Yeqing Wu; Xueyang Chi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Successful Increase of Outpatient Clinic Continuity in a Fellowship Quality Improvement Project.

Authors:  Ranjini Srinivasan; Peter Sambatakos; Mariellen Lane; Usha Krishnan; Rachel Weller; Jonathan N Flyer; Keith Robinson; Julie Glickstein
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2020-05-20

5.  The effect of team collaboration and continuity of care on health and disability among rehabilitation patients: a longitudinal survey-based study from western Norway.

Authors:  Merethe Hustoft; Eva Biringer; Sturla Gjesdal; Vegard Pihl Moen; Jörg Aβmus; Øystein Hetlevik
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Patients' perceptions of continuity of care across primary care level and emergency departments in Belgium: cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Marlene Karam; Anne-Sophie Lambert; Jean Macq
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  The psychometric properties of the person-centered therapeutic relationship in physiotherapy scale.

Authors:  Óscar Rodríguez-Nogueira; Jaume Morera Balaguer; Abel Nogueira López; Juan Roldán Merino; José-Martín Botella-Rico; Sonia Del Río-Medina; Antonio R Moreno Poyato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Construction, Factor Structure, and Internal Consistency Reliability of the Hospital Physical Therapy Perceived Satisfaction Questionnaire (H-PTPS).

Authors:  Manuel Albornoz-Cabello; José Manuel Pérez-Mármol; Mª de Los Ángeles Cardero-Durán; Cristo Jesús Barrios-Quinta; Luis Espejo-Antúnez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.