Literature DB >> 23643630

Tradeoffs between the strength of conformity and number of conformists in variable environments.

Anne Kandler1, Kevin N Laland.   

Abstract

Organisms often respond to environmental change phenotypically, through learning strategies that enhance fitness in variable and changing conditions. But which strategies should we expect in population exposed to those conditions? We address this question by developing a mathematical model that specifies the consequences of different mixtures of individual and social learning strategies on the frequencies of different cultural variants in temporally and spatially changing environments. Assuming that alternative cultural variants are differently well-adapted to diverse environmental conditions, we are able to evaluate which mixture of learning strategies maximises the mean fitness of the population. We find that, even in rapidly changing environments, a high proportion of the population will always engage in social learning. In those environments, the highest adaptation levels are achieved through relatively high fractions of individual learning and a strong conformist bias. We establish a negative relationship between the proportion of the population learning socially and the strength of conformity operating in a population: strong conformity requires fewer conformists (i.e. larger proportion of individual learning), while many conformists can only be found when conformist transmission is weak. Investigations of cultural diversity show that in frequently changing environments high levels of adaptation require high level of cultural diversity. Finally, we demonstrate how the developed mathematical framework can be applied to time series of usage or occurrence data of cultural traits. Using Approximate Bayesian Computation we are able to infer information about the underlying learning processes that could have produced observed patterns of variation in the dataset.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Approximate Bayesian Computation; Conformity; Cultural diversity; Environmental heterogeneity; Social learning

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23643630     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  13 in total

1.  A generative inference framework for analysing patterns of cultural change in sparse population data with evidence for fashion trends in LBK culture.

Authors:  Anne Kandler; Stephen Shennan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Conformity does not perpetuate suboptimal traditions in a wild population of songbirds.

Authors:  Lucy M Aplin; Ben C Sheldon; Richard McElreath
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Identifying innovation in laboratory studies of cultural evolution: rates of retention and measures of adaptation.

Authors:  Christine A Caldwell; Hannah Cornish; Anne Kandler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Lack of conformity to new local dietary preferences in migrating captive chimpanzees.

Authors:  Gillian L Vale; Sarah J Davis; Erica van de Waal; Steven J Schapiro; Susan P Lambeth; Andrew Whiten
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 5.  Generative inference for cultural evolution.

Authors:  Anne Kandler; Adam Powell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Conformist social learning leads to self-organised prevention against adverse bias in risky decision making.

Authors:  Wataru Toyokawa; Wolfgang Gaissmaier
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 8.713

7.  Social network- and community-level influences on contraceptive use: evidence from rural Poland.

Authors:  Heidi Colleran; Ruth Mace
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Cultural conformity generates extremely stable traditions in bird song.

Authors:  Robert F Lachlan; Oliver Ratmann; Stephen Nowicki
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Cultural evolution of conformity and anticonformity.

Authors:  Kaleda Krebs Denton; Yoav Ram; Uri Liberman; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The fundamentals of cultural adaptation: implications for human adaptation.

Authors:  Laurel Fogarty; Anne Kandler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.