Literature DB >> 23643606

Effect of bioactive borate glass microstructure on bone regeneration, angiogenesis, and hydroxyapatite conversion in a rat calvarial defect model.

Lianxiang Bi1, Mohamed N Rahaman, Delbert E Day, Zackary Brown, Christopher Samujh, Xin Liu, Ali Mohammadkhah, Vladimir Dusevich, J David Eick, Lynda F Bonewald.   

Abstract

Borate bioactive glasses are biocompatible and enhance new bone formation, but the effect of their microstructure on bone regeneration has received little attention. In this study scaffolds of borate bioactive glass (1393B3) with three different microstructures (trabecular, fibrous, and oriented) were compared for their capacity to regenerate bone in a rat calvarial defect model. 12weeks post-implantation the amount of new bone, mineralization, and blood vessel area in the scaffolds were evaluated using histomorphometric analysis and scanning electron microscopy. The amount of new bone formed was 33%, 23%, and 15%, respectively, of the total defect area for the trabecular, oriented, and fibrous microstructures. In comparison, the percent new bone formed in implants composed of silicate 45S5 bioactive glass particles (250-300μm) was 19%. Doping the borate glass with copper (0.4 wt.% CuO) had little effect on bone regeneration in the trabecular and oriented scaffolds, but significantly enhanced bone regeneration in the fibrous scaffolds (from 15 to 33%). The scaffolds were completely converted to hydroxyapatite within the 12week implantation. The amount of hydroxyapatite formed, 22%, 35%, and 48%, respectively, for the trabecular, oriented, and fibrous scaffolds, increased with increasing volume fraction of glass in the as-fabricated scaffold. Blood vessels infiltrated into all the scaffolds, but the trabecular scaffolds had a higher average blood vessel area compared with the oriented and fibrous scaffolds. While all three scaffold microstructures were effective in supporting bone regeneration, the trabecular scaffolds supported more bone formation and may be more promising in bone repair.
Copyright © 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23643606     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  13 in total

1.  Hollow hydroxyapatite microspheres: a novel bioactive and osteoconductive carrier for controlled release of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in bone regeneration.

Authors:  Wei Xiao; Hailuo Fu; Mohamed N Rahaman; Yonxing Liu; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Chemical stability and osteogenic activity of plasma-sprayed boron-modified calcium silicate-based coatings.

Authors:  Xiang Lu; Kai Li; Youtao Xie; Liping Huang; Xuebin Zheng
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Nanotechnology for angiogenesis: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Saeid Kargozar; Francesco Baino; Sepideh Hamzehlou; Michael R Hamblin; Masoud Mozafari
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 54.564

4.  The interfacial pH of acidic degradable polymeric biomaterials and its effects on osteoblast behavior.

Authors:  Changshun Ruan; Nan Hu; Yufei Ma; Yuxiao Li; Juan Liu; Xinzhou Zhang; Haobo Pan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Antibiotic Elution and Mechanical Strength of PMMA Bone Cement Loaded With Borate Bioactive Glass.

Authors:  Grahmm A Funk; Jonathan C Burkes; Kimberly A Cole; Mohamed N Rahaman; Terence E McIff
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2018-09-07

6.  Functionalization of SF/HAP Scaffold with GO-PEI-miRNA inhibitor Complexes to Enhance Bone Regeneration through Activating Transcription Factor 4.

Authors:  Lingling Ou; Yong Lan; Zhiqiang Feng; Longbao Feng; Junjie Yang; Yu Liu; Liming Bian; Jiali Tan; Renfa Lai; Rui Guo
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 7.  Foam Replica Method in the Manufacturing of Bioactive Glass Scaffolds: Out-of-Date Technology or Still Underexploited Potential?

Authors:  Elisa Fiume; Sara Ciavattini; Enrica Verné; Francesco Baino
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  In vitro Evaluation of Porous borosilicate, borophosphate and phosphate Bioactive Glasses Scaffolds fabricated using Foaming Agent for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  E P Erasmus; R Sule; O T Johnson; J Massera; I Sigalas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Bioactive Glasses: From Parent 45S5 Composition to Scaffold-Assisted Tissue-Healing Therapies.

Authors:  Elisa Fiume; Jacopo Barberi; Enrica Verné; Francesco Baino
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-03-16

10.  A novel vehicle-like drug delivery 3D printing scaffold and its applications for a rat femoral bone repairing in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Zhengwei Deng; Jing Chen; Xin Qi; Libing Pang; Bocai Lin; Yan Teik Yuin Adib; Na Miao; Deping Wang; Yadong Zhang; Jiusheng Li; Xiangqiong Zeng
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.