Literature DB >> 23643502

Ventricular arrhythmias and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: need for primary prevention?

Arthur R Garan1, Melana Yuzefpolskaya, Paolo C Colombo, John P Morrow, Rosie Te-Frey, Drew Dano, Hiroo Takayama, Yoshifumi Naka, Hasan Garan, Ulrich P Jorde, Nir Uriel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the prevalence and significance of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) and the role of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in patients supported by a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD).
BACKGROUND: VAs are common in patients supported by CF-LVADs but prospective data to support the routine use of ICDs in these patients are lacking.
METHODS: All patients supported by long-term CF-LVAD receiving care at our institution were enrolled. The ICDs were interrogated at baseline and throughout prospective follow-up. The VA was defined as ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation lasting >30 s or effectively terminated by appropriate ICD tachytherapy. The primary outcome was the occurrence of VA >30 days after CF-LVAD implantation.
RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were enrolled; 77 had an ICD and 17 did not. Five patients with an ICD had it deactivated or a depleted battery not replaced during the study. Twenty-two patients had a VA >30 days after LVAD implantation. Pre-operative VA was the major predictor of post-operative arrhythmia. Absence of pre-operative VA conferred a low risk of post-operative VA (4.0% vs. 45.5%; p < 0.001). No patients discharged from the hospital without an ICD after CF-LVAD implantation died during 276.2 months of follow-up (mean time without ICD, 12.7 ± 12.3 months).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pre-operative VA are at risk of recurrent VA while on CF-LVAD support and should have active ICD therapy to minimize sustained VA. Patients without pre-operative VA are at low risk and may not need active ICD therapy.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23643502     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  41 in total

1.  The role of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients bridged to transplantation with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: A propensity score matched analysis.

Authors:  Kevin J Clerkin; Veli K Topkara; Donna M Mancini; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Ryan T Demmer; Jose M Dizon; Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; Paolo C Colombo; A Reshad Garan
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 2.  Current Review of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Use in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Jacinthe Boulet; Emmanuelle Massie; Blandine Mondésert; Yoan Lamarche; Michel Carrier; Anique Ducharme
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2019-12

3.  Clinical implications of left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Authors:  Fanny Boudghène-Stambouli; Stéphane Boulé; Céline Goéminne; Edward Botcherby; Christelle Marquié; Claude Kouakam; Laurence Guédon-Moreau; Guillaume Schurtz; Pascal de Groote; Nicolas Lamblin; Marie Fertin; Emmanuel Robin; François Brigadeau; Didier Klug; Dominique Lacroix; Jonathan Meurice; Ludivine Wissocque; André Vincentelli; Salem Kacet
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Simultaneous procedures during left ventricular assist device implantation: is less always more?

Authors:  Nikhil Jaik; Robert S D Higgins; Bryan A Whitson
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2014-03

5.  Catheter ablation of electrical storm in a patient with left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Anja Schade; Karin Nentwich; Thomas Deneke
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2014-06

6.  The importance of coronary artery disease and special considerations for left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Mevlüt Çelik; John M Stulak; Simon Maltais
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-03

7.  Medical management of patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Adam D Devore; Robert J Mentz; Chetan B Patel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-02

Review 8.  Ventricular Tachycardia with ICD Shocks: When to Medicate and When to Ablate.

Authors:  Amir AbdelWahab; John Sapp
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Long-term management of end-stage heart failure.

Authors:  Marlena V Habal; A Reshad Garan
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2017-07-18

10.  Catch 22: a case of incessant ventricular tachycardia post-left ventricular assist device resulting in right ventricular failure, left ventricular cavity obliteration and failure of endocardial ventricular tachycardia ablation.

Authors:  Amit J Thosani; Stephen H Bailey; Amresh Raina
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 1.731

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.