Literature DB >> 23643154

Group versus individual family planning counseling in Ghana: a randomized, noninferiority trial.

Hilary M Schwandt1, Andreea A Creanga, Kwabena A Danso, Richard M K Adanu, Tsiri Agbenyega, Michelle J Hindin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Group, rather than individual, family planning counseling has the potential to increase family planning knowledge and use through more efficient use of limited human resources. STUDY
DESIGN: A randomized, noninferiority study design was utilized to identify whether group family planning counseling is as effective as individual family planning counseling in Ghana. Female gynecology patients were enrolled from two teaching hospitals in Ghana in June and July 2008. Patients were randomized to receive either group or individual family planning counseling. The primary outcome in this study was change in modern contraceptive method knowledge. Changes in family planning use intention before and after the intervention and intended method type were also explored.
RESULTS: Comparisons between the two study arms suggest that randomization was successful. The difference in change in modern contraceptive methods known from baseline to follow-up between the two study arms (group-individual), adjusted for study site, was -0.21, (95% confidence interval: -0.53 to 0.12) suggesting no difference between the two arms.
CONCLUSIONS: Group family planning counseling was as effective as individual family planning counseling in increasing modern contraceptive knowledge among female gynecology patients in Ghana.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Family planning counseling; Ghana; Group; Individual; Noninferiority trial

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23643154     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  3 in total

1.  Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter-term hormonal methods of contraception.

Authors:  Natasha Mack; Tineke J Crawford; Jeanne-Marie Guise; Mario Chen; Thomas W Grey; Paul J Feldblum; Laurie L Stockton; Maria F Gallo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-23

Review 2.  Interventions to improve the person-centered quality of family planning services: a narrative review.

Authors:  Nadia Diamond-Smith; Ruby Warnock; May Sudhinaraset
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.223

3.  Disrespectful care in family planning services among youth and adult simulated clients in public sector facilities in Malawi.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hazel; Diwakar Mohan; Ephraim Chirwa; Mary Phiri; Fannie Kachale; Patrick Msukwa; Joanne Katz; Melissa A Marx
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.