| Literature DB >> 23642552 |
Mark S Shiroishi1, Michael T Booker, Manyoo Agarwal, Nidhi Jain, Ilana Naghi, Alexander Lerner, Meng Law.
Abstract
Although conventional contrast-enhanced MR imaging remains the standard-of-care imaging method in the posttreatment evaluation of gliomas, recent developments in therapeutic options such as chemoradiation and antiangiogenic agents have caused the neuro-oncology community to rethink traditional imaging criteria. This article highlights the latest recommendations. These recommendations should be viewed as works in progress. As more is learned about the pathophysiology of glioma treatment response, quantitative imaging biomarkers will be validated within this context. There will likely be further refinements to glioma response criteria, although the lack of technical standardization in image acquisition, postprocessing, and interpretation also need to be addressed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23642552 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2013.02.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am ISSN: 1064-9689 Impact factor: 2.266