Literature DB >> 23642493

Clinical outcomes of the Realize Adjustable Gastric Band-C at 2 years in a United States population.

Scott A Cunneen1, Collin E M Brathwaite, Christopher Joyce, Keith Gersin, Keith Kim, Jon L Schram, Erik B Wilson, Michael Schwiers, Mario Gutierrez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2008, the Realize Band (RB) adopted a precurved design (RB-C). We present 2-year outcomes data from the first multiinstitutional study of RB-C. The objective of this study was to analyze weight loss and safety data from bariatric practices in the United States, including academic, nonacademic, public, and private.
METHODS: The study included adult RB-C patients with a preoperative body mass index (BMI)≥40 kg/m(2) or >35 kg/m(2) with co-morbidity. Exclusions included RB-C's label contraindications for use. Outcomes parameters were percent excess weight loss (%EWL), BMI change, number and volume of band adjustments, and adverse events.
RESULTS: A total of 231 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Of these, 161 had 24-month data available. Mean %EWL was 44.4%±26.9% (P<.0001). BMI decreased from 44.1±5.7 kg/m(2) to 35.3±6.9 kg/m(2) (P<.0001). Percent EWL varied by preoperative BMI (P = .0002), bariatric practice (P<.0001), aftercare frequency (P = .0004), and band fill frequency (P = .0271), but %EWL was not influenced by gender, race, or age (P>.20 each). Adverse events were dysphagia (21.2%), gastroesophageal reflux (21.6%), and vomiting (30.7%). Incidence of pouch dilation, esophageal dilation, and slippage was ≤1%. Revisions (2.2%) were for unbuckled band, tube kinking, slippage, and suspected band leak (1 each). No erosions, explants, or mortality were reported.
CONCLUSION: RB-C appears to be as well tolerated and effective as the first generation RB for weight loss. The near 45% EWL at 2 years is consistent with other high-quality publications on the RB. Preoperative BMI and frequency of postoperative care, including frequency of band fills, influence %EWL. Significant weight loss is achievable with RB-C despite variable postoperative management practices. The low morbidity and the absence of mortality at 24 months reflect positively on the RB-C characteristics.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; Gastric band; LAGB; Morbid obesity; Realize; Realize Adjustable Gastric Band; laparoscopic adjustable gastric band

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23642493     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  4 in total

1.  Closed-loop gastric electrical stimulation versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric band for the treatment of obesity: a randomized 12-month multicenter study.

Authors:  T Horbach; G Meyer; S Morales-Conde; I Alarcón; F Favretti; M Anselmino; G M Rovera; J Dargent; C Stroh; M Susewind; A J Torres
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  Gastric Banding with Previous Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (Band over Pouch): Not Worth the Weight.

Authors:  Amir H Sohail; Raelina S Howell; Barbara M Brathwaite; Jeffrey Silverstein; Leo Amodu; Patricia Cherasard; Patrizio Petrone; Anirudha Goparaju; Jun Levine; Venkata Kella; Collin E M Brathwaite
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.789

3.  Implanted Closed-Loop Gastric Electrical Stimulation (CLGES) System with Sensor-Based Feedback Safely Limits Weight Regain at 24 Months.

Authors:  S Morales-Conde; I Alarcón Del Agua; L Busetto; F Favretti; M Anselmino; G M Rovera; M Socas-Macias; A Barranco-Moreno; R Province-Azalde; A J Torres
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Pathophysiological mechanisms linking obesity and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Leo Alexandre; Elizabeth Long; Ian Lp Beales
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2014-11-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.