Literature DB >> 23640275

Diversity of planktonic and attached bacterial communities in a phenol-contaminated sandstone aquifer.

Athanasios Rizoulis1, David R Elliott, Stephen A Rolfe, Steven F Thornton, Steven A Banwart, Roger W Pickup, Julie D Scholes.   

Abstract

Polluted aquifers contain indigenous microbial communities with the potential for in situ bioremediation. However, the effect of hydrogeochemical gradients on in situ microbial communities (especially at the plume fringe, where natural attenuation is higher) is still not clear. In this study, we used culture-independent techniques to investigate the diversity of in situ planktonic and attached bacterial communities in a phenol-contaminated sandstone aquifer. Within the upper and lower plume fringes, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles indicated that planktonic community structure was influenced by the steep hydrogeochemical gradient of the plume rather than the spatial location in the aquifer. Under the same hydrogeochemical conditions (in the lower plume fringe, 30 m below ground level), 16S rRNA gene cloning and sequencing showed that planktonic and attached bacterial communities differed markedly and that the attached community was more diverse. The 16S rRNA gene phylogeny also suggested that a phylogenetically diverse bacterial community operated at this depth (30 mbgl), with biodegradation of phenolic compounds by nitrate-reducing Azoarcus and Acidovorax strains potentially being an important process. The presence of acetogenic and sulphate-reducing bacteria only in the planktonic clone library indicates that some natural attenuation processes may occur preferentially in one of the two growth phases (attached or planktonic). Therefore, this study has provided a better understanding of the microbial ecology of this phenol-contaminated aquifer, and it highlights the need for investigating both planktonic and attached microbial communities when assessing the potential for natural attenuation in contaminated aquifers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23640275     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-013-0233-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  51 in total

Review 1.  Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics.

Authors:  M E Davey; G A O'toole
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Ecological and physiological analyses of Pseudomonad species within a phenol remediation system.

Authors:  A S Whiteley; S Wiles; A K Lilley; J Philp; M J Bailey
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  Functional and compositional comparison of two activated sludge communities remediating coking effluent.

Authors:  Mike Manefield; Robert I Griffiths; Mary Beth Leigh; Ray Fisher; Andrew S Whiteley
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.491

4.  Subsurface ecosystem resilience: long-term attenuation of subsurface contaminants supports a dynamic microbial community.

Authors:  Jane M Yagi; Edward F Neuhauser; John A Ripp; David M Mauro; Eugene L Madsen
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Dynamic changes in microbial community structure and function in phenol-degrading microcosms inoculated with cells from a contaminated aquifer.

Authors:  David R Elliott; Julie D Scholes; Steven F Thornton; Athanasios Rizoulis; Steven A Banwart; Stephen A Rolfe
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 4.194

6.  Genotypic diversity of Acidovorax strains isolated from activated sludge and description of Acidovorax defluvii sp. nov.

Authors:  R Schulze; S Spring; R Amann; I Huber; W Ludwig; K H Schleifer; P Kämpfer
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.022

7.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Microbial communities associated with anaerobic benzene degradation in a petroleum-contaminated aquifer.

Authors:  J N Rooney-Varga; R T Anderson; J L Fraga; D Ringelberg; D R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Methylobacter tundripaludum sp. nov., a methane-oxidizing bacterium from Arctic wetland soil on the Svalbard islands, Norway (78 degrees N).

Authors:  Ingvild Wartiainen; Anne Grethe Hestnes; Ian R McDonald; Mette M Svenning
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.747

10.  New screening software shows that most recent large 16S rRNA gene clone libraries contain chimeras.

Authors:  Kevin E Ashelford; Nadia A Chuzhanova; John C Fry; Antonia J Jones; Andrew J Weightman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  4 in total

1.  Polyphasic analysis of an Azoarcus-Leptothrix-dominated bacterial biofilm developed on stainless steel surface in a gasoline-contaminated hypoxic groundwater.

Authors:  Tibor Benedek; András Táncsics; István Szabó; Milán Farkas; Sándor Szoboszlay; Krisztina Fábián; Gergely Maróti; Balázs Kriszt
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Cytometric patterns reveal growth states of Shewanella putrefaciens.

Authors:  Susanne Melzer; Gudrun Winter; Kathrin Jäger; Thomas Hübschmann; Gerd Hause; Frank Syrowatka; Hauke Harms; Attila Tárnok; Susann Müller
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.813

3.  Community Analysis and Recovery of Phenol-degrading Bacteria from Drinking Water Biofilters.

Authors:  Qihui Gu; Qingping Wu; Jumei Zhang; Weipeng Guo; Huiqing Wu; Ming Sun
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Distribution of ETBE-degrading microorganisms and functional capability in groundwater, and implications for characterising aquifer ETBE biodegradation potential.

Authors:  Henry C G Nicholls; Stephen A Rolfe; Helen E H Mallinson; Markus Hjort; Michael J Spence; Matthijs Bonte; Steven F Thornton
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.