Literature DB >> 23639698

Marketing foods to children: a comparison of nutrient content between children's and non-children's products.

Amelia Lythgoe1, Caireen Roberts, Angela M Madden, Kirsten L Rennie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The predominance of marketing of products high in fat, sugar and/or salt to children has been well documented and implicated in the incidence of obesity. The present study aimed to determine whether foods marketed to children in UK supermarkets are nutritionally similar to the non-children's equivalent, focusing on food categories that may be viewed as healthier options.
DESIGN: Nutritional data were collected on yoghurts (n 147), cereal bars (n 145) and ready meals (n 144) from seven major UK supermarkets and categorised as children's or non-children's products based on the characteristics, promotional nature or information on the product packaging. Fat, sugar and salt content was compared per 100 g and per recommended portion size.
SETTING: UK.
RESULTS: Per 100 g, children's yoghurts and cereal bars were higher in total sugars, fat and saturated fat than the non-children's; this was significant for all except sugar and total fat in cereal bars. Per portion these differences remained, except for sugars in yoghurts. Conversely children's ready meals were significantly lower in these nutrients per portion than non-children's, but not when expressed per 100 g. Children's yoghurts and ready meals had significantly lower sodium content than non-children's both per portion and per 100 g.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences between the nutritional composition of children's and non-children's products were observed but varied depending on the unit reference. A significant number of products marketed towards children were higher in fat, sugar and salt than those marketed to the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23639698     DOI: 10.1017/S1368980013000943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  8 in total

1.  Nutritional quality of packaged foods targeted at children in Brazil: which ones should be eligible to bear nutrient claims?

Authors:  V M Rodrigues; M Rayner; A C Fernandes; R C de Oliveira; R P C Proença; G M R Fiates
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  Investigating the nutritional value of foods targeting children.

Authors:  Sümeyye Güzel; Alev Keser; Şükrü Hatun
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 4.652

3.  Free and Added Sugar Consumption and Adherence to Guidelines: The UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2014/15-2015/16).

Authors:  Birdem Amoutzopoulos; Toni Steer; Caireen Roberts; David Collins; Polly Page
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Trends in Food Consumption Patterns of US Infants and Toddlers from Feeding Infants and Toddlers Studies (FITS) in 2002, 2008, 2016.

Authors:  Emily W Duffy; Melissa C Kay; Emma Jacquier; Diane Catellier; Joel Hampton; Andrea S Anater; Mary Story
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Nutritional Quality and Degree of Processing of Children's Foods Assessment on the French Market.

Authors:  Celine Richonnet; Françoise Mosser; Elisabeth Favre; Martine Robert; Françoise Martin; Isabelle Thiebaut
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Sugar Content and Warning Criteria Evaluation for Popular Sugar-Sweetened Beverages in Taipei, Taiwan.

Authors:  Chieh Yen; Ya-Li Huang; Mei Chung; Yi-Chun Chen
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 6.706

7.  Evaluation of the nutrient content of yogurts: a comprehensive survey of yogurt products in the major UK supermarkets.

Authors:  J Bernadette Moore; Annabelle Horti; Barbara A Fielding
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Nutrient Composition of Foods Marketed to Children or Adolescents Sold in the Spanish Market: Are They Any Better?

Authors:  Marta Beltrá; Keila Soares-Micoanski; Eva-Maria Navarrete-Muñoz; Ana B Ropero
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.