Literature DB >> 23639602

Prevention of interval colorectal cancers: what every clinician needs to know.

Swati G Patel1, Dennis J Ahnen2.   

Abstract

Colonoscopic screening and surveillance have been very effective tools in the fight against colorectal cancer (CRC). Colonoscopy is more than a cancer screening test; it also can prevent CRC by detecting and removing precancerous lesions. Despite this potential, there has been increasing concern about CRCs that occur after a previous colonoscopy and before the next screening/surveillance examination (interval CRCs). The etiology of interval CRC is thought to be caused mostly by missed or incompletely resected lesions on index colonoscopy with some contribution of rapidly progressive new lesions. If this is true, many interval cancers should be preventable by improving colonoscopy technique. There are a variety of strategies to decrease interval CRC rates including use of a split-dosed bowel preparation, optimizing withdrawal technique, ensuring complete polypectomy, and careful pathologic examination of the tissue removed. Furthermore, there should be an increased emphasis on how endoscopists are trained to cultivate high-quality technique throughout their careers. It is important to inform patients that even high-quality colonoscopy is not perfectly sensitive for the detection of advanced neoplasia. Improving colonoscopy quality can decrease interval CRC rates and further decrease CRC incidence and mortality.
Copyright © 2014 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADR; Advanced Neoplasia; CAC; CI; CRC; Colonoscopy; IRR; Interval Cancer; NBI; OR; adenoma detection rate; cap-assisted colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; confidence interval; incomplete resection rate; narrow band imaging; odds ratio

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23639602     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  23 in total

1.  Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality.

Authors:  Rajesh N Keswani; Rena Yadlapati; Kristine M Gleason; Jody D Ciolino; Michael Manka; Kevin J O'Leary; Cynthia Barnard; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Diverticulosis and the risk of interval colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gregory S Cooper; Fang Xu; Mark D Schluchter; Siran M Koroukian; Jill S Barnholtz Sloan
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Risk factors of developing interval early gastric cancer after negative endoscopy.

Authors:  Young Sin Cho; Il-Kwun Chung; Ji Hyun Kim; Yunho Jung; Tae Hoon Lee; Sang-Heum Park; Sun-Joo Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Multi-Target Stool DNA Test: Is the Future Here?

Authors:  Seth Sweetser; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-06

5.  Sessile serrated polyps: detection, eradication, and prevention of the evil twin.

Authors:  Joshua C Obuch; Courtney M Pigott; Dennis J Ahnen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03

6.  Deep Learning Localizes and Identifies Polyps in Real Time With 96% Accuracy in Screening Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Gregor Urban; Priyam Tripathi; Talal Alkayali; Mohit Mittal; Farid Jalali; William Karnes; Pierre Baldi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Screening Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time Threshold for Adequate Proximal Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.

Authors:  Viral D Patel; William K Thompson; Brittany R Lapin; Jay L Goldstein; Eugene F Yen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Multi-target stool DNA test: a new high bar for noninvasive screening.

Authors:  David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Should Assessment of Quality Indicator of Colonoscopy Be Varied Depending on the Colonoscopic Technique Level?

Authors:  Bum Su Choung; Seong Hun Kim; Kyung Bo Yoo; Seung Young Seo; In Hee Kim; Seung Ok Lee; Soo Teik Lee; Sang Wook Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Excess of proximal microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer in African Americans from a multiethnic study.

Authors:  Rosa M Xicola; Molly Gagnon; Julia R Clark; Timothy Carroll; Weihua Gao; Christian Fernandez; Dragana Mijic; James B Rawson; Ashley Janoski; Cenk K Pusatcioglu; Priyanka Rajaram; Adam B Gluskin; Maureen Regan; Vivek Chaudhry; Herand Abcarian; Jennifer Blumetti; Jose Cintron; Joshua Melson; Hui Xie; Grace Guzman; Rajyasree Emmadi; Victoria Alagiozian-Angelova; Sonia S Kupfer; Carol Braunschweig; Nathan A Ellis; Xavier Llor
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.