Literature DB >> 23639173

Brightness differences influence the evaluation of affective pictures.

Daniël Lakens1, Daniel A Fockenberg, Karin P H Lemmens, Jaap Ham, Cees J H Midden.   

Abstract

We explored the possibility of a general brightness bias: brighter pictures are evaluated more positively, while darker pictures are evaluated more negatively. In Study 1 we found that positive pictures are brighter than negative pictures in two affective picture databases (the IAPS and the GAPED). Study 2 revealed that because researchers select affective pictures on the extremity of their affective rating without controlling for brightness differences, pictures used in positive conditions of experiments were on average brighter than those used in negative conditions. Going beyond correlational support for our hypothesis, Studies 3 and 4 showed that brighter versions of neutral pictures were evaluated more positively than darker versions of the same picture. Study 5 revealed that people categorised positive words more quickly than negative words after a bright picture prime, and vice versa for negative pictures. Together, these studies provide strong support for the hypotheses that picture brightness influences evaluations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23639173     DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2013.781501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Emot        ISSN: 0269-9931


  17 in total

1.  Affective motivational direction drives asymmetric frontal hemisphere activation.

Authors:  Bryan D Poole; Philip A Gable
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Representations of modality-specific affective processing for visual and auditory stimuli derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  Svetlana V Shinkareva; Jing Wang; Jongwan Kim; Matthew J Facciani; Laura B Baucom; Douglas H Wedell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Identifying Core Affect in Individuals from fMRI Responses to Dynamic Naturalistic Audiovisual Stimuli.

Authors:  Jongwan Kim; Jing Wang; Douglas H Wedell; Svetlana V Shinkareva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Socio-Moral Image Database (SMID): A novel stimulus set for the study of social, moral and affective processes.

Authors:  Damien L Crone; Stefan Bode; Carsten Murawski; Simon M Laham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Nencki Affective Picture System: Cross-Cultural Study in Europe and Iran.

Authors:  Monika Riegel; Abnoos Moslehi; Jarosław M Michałowski; Łukasz Żurawski; Marko Horvat; Marek Wypych; Katarzyna Jednoróg; Artur Marchewka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-03

6.  Warm, lively, rough? Assessing agreement on aesthetic effects of artworks.

Authors:  Eva Specker; Michael Forster; Hanna Brinkmann; Jane Boddy; Beatrice Immelmann; Jürgen Goller; Matthew Pelowski; Raphael Rosenberg; Helmut Leder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Abstract Representations of Emotions Perceived From the Face, Body, and Whole-Person Expressions in the Left Postcentral Gyrus.

Authors:  Linjing Cao; Junhai Xu; Xiaoli Yang; Xianglin Li; Baolin Liu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Implicit Associations With Nature and Urban Environments: Effects of Lower-Level Processed Image Properties.

Authors:  Claudia Menzel; Gerhard Reese
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-20

9.  Distinct effects of contrast and color on subjective rating of fearfulness.

Authors:  Zhengang Lu; Bingbing Guo; Anne Boguslavsky; Marcus Cappiello; Weiwei Zhang; Ming Meng
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-08

10.  Seeing life through positive-tinted glasses: color-meaning associations.

Authors:  Sandrine Gil; Ludovic Le Bigot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.