Literature DB >> 23638803

Functional and anatomical results after a single intravitreal Ozurdex injection in retinal vein occlusion: a 6-month follow-up -- the SOLO study.

Athanasios Bezatis1, Georg Spital, Fabian Höhn, Mathias Maier, Christoph R Clemens, Joachim Wachtlin, Florian Lehmann, Lars Olof Hattenbach, Nicolas Feltgen, Carsten H Meyer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implants in eyes with cystoid macular oedema (CME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) or central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in the clinical everyday practice, examine the effects of early retreatment and compare the results with the GENEVA study.
METHODS: The charts of 102 patients (102 eyes) with CME secondary to BRVO (n = 54) or CRVO (n = 48) treated with Ozurdex at 8 centres were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were examined monthly over a 24-week period. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy, measurement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and measurement of the central retinal thickness (CRT) with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were performed at baseline and at every follow-up examination. With progression of the disease (loss of one line or increased central retinal thickness (CRT) of 150 μm), a reinjection of Ozurdex or anti-VEGF was offered. Additional supplementing sectorial or panretinal laser photocoagulation was considered based on the individual status of the retina.
RESULTS: In the BRVO group, the median BCVA was 0.6 logMAR (Snellen equivalent of 0.25) at baseline and improved to 0.4 logMAR (Snellen equivalent of 0.40) after 4 weeks, 0.3 logMAR (Snellen equivalent of 0.50) after 8 weeks, 0.4 logMAR (Snellen equivalent of 0.40) after 12 weeks, 0.5 logMAR (Snellen equivalent of 0.32) after 16 weeks, 0.4 logMAR (Snellen equivalent of 0.40) after 20 weeks and 0.45 logMAR (Snellen equivalent of 0.35) after 24 weeks. The mean CRT was 559 ± (SD) 209 μm at baseline and it decreased to 335 ± 148 μm after 4 weeks, 316 ± 137 μm after 8 weeks, 369 ± 126 μm after 12 weeks, 407 ± 161 μm after 16 weeks, 399 ± 191 μm after 20 weeks and 419 ± 196 μm after 24 weeks. In the CRVO group, the median BCVA was 0.7 logMAR (Snellen equivalent of 0.20) at baseline and improved to 0.4 logMAR (Snellen equivalent of 0.40) after 4 weeks, 0.4 logMAR (Snellen equivalent of 0.40) after 8 weeks, 0.6 logMAR (Snellen equivalent of 0.25) after 12 weeks, 0.6 logMAR (Snellen equivalent of 0.25) after 16 weeks, 0.5 logMAR (Snellen equivalent of 0.32) after 20 weeks and 0.52 logMAR (Snellen equivalent of 0.30) after 24 weeks. The mean CRT at baseline was 740 ± 351 μm and it decreased to 419 ± 315 μm after 4 weeks, 352 ± 261 μm after 8 weeks, 455 ± 251 μm after 12 weeks, 497 ± 280 μm after 16 weeks, 468 ± 301 μm after 20 weeks and 395 ± 234 μm after 24 weeks. The BCVA improvement was statistically significantly better (p < 0.05) compared with baseline in both groups at every follow-up visit. The mean CRT maintained significantly better when compared with baseline in both groups at all follow-up visits. Early reinjection was indicated in BRVO in 40.7% after 17.5 ± 4.2 weeks and in CRVO in 50% after 17.68 ± 4.2. Six eyes (11%) with BRVO received a sectorial laser photocoagulation at a mean interval of 22 ± 5.0 weeks. Seven eyes (15%) with CRVO received a panretinal laser photocoagulation after a mean interval of 18 ± 7.0 weeks. The BCVA improvement and the mean CRT reduction were statistically significant (p < 0.05) compared with baseline in both groups at every follow-up visit.
CONCLUSIONS: Dexamethasone intravitreal implant resulted in a significant improvement of the BCVA and reduction of CME in patients with BRVO or CRVO. Early retreatment after 16 weeks instead of 24 weeks, like in the GENEVA study, was indicated in 50% to stabilize the improved functional and anatomical results.
© 2013 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ozurdex; branch retinal vein occlusion; central retinal vein occlusion; dexamethasone; intravitreal injection; slow-release drug

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23638803     DOI: 10.1111/aos.12020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  37 in total

1.  Safety and long-term efficacy of repeated dexamethasone intravitreal implants for the treatment of cystoid macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion with or without a switch to anti-VEGF agents: a 3-year experience.

Authors:  Julie Blanc; Clémence Deschasse; Laurent Kodjikian; Corinne Dot; Alain-Marie Bron; Catherine Creuzot-Garcher
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Real-life clinical data for dexamethasone and ranibizumab in the treatment of branch or central retinal vein occlusion over a period of six months.

Authors:  Sibylle Winterhalter; Annabelle Eckert; Gerrit-Alexander Vom Brocke; Alice Schneider; Dominika Pohlmann; Daniel Pilger; Antonia M Joussen; Matus Rehak; Ulrike Grittner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Penetration force, geometry, and cutting profile of the novel and old Ozurdex needle: the MONO study.

Authors:  Carsten H Meyer; Zengping Liu; Christian K Brinkmann; Eduardo B Rodrigues; Thomas Bertelmann
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.671

4.  Ranibizumab versus dexamethasone implant for central retinal vein occlusion: the RANIDEX study.

Authors:  Irini Chatziralli; George Theodossiadis; Stamatina A Kabanarou; Efstratios Parikakis; Tina Xirou; Panagiotis Mitropoulos; Panagiotis Theodossiadis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Anatomical and functional recurrence after dexamethasone intravitreal implants: a 6-month prospective study.

Authors:  V Fortoul; P Denis; L Kodjikian
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  [Intravitreal dexamethasone implant for treatment of persistent postoperative macular edema after vitrectomy].

Authors:  L-O Hattenbach; C Kuhli-Hattenbach; C Springer; J Callizo; H Hoerauf
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Evaluation of pain during intravitreal Ozurdex injections vs. intravitreal bevacizumab injections.

Authors:  E Moisseiev; M Regenbogen; T Rabinovitch; A Barak; A Loewenstein; M Goldstein
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Estimating ranibizumab injection numbers and visual acuity at 12 months based on 2-month data on branch retinal vein occlusion treatment.

Authors:  Toshinori Murata; Mineo Kondo; Makoto Inoue; Shintaro Nakao; Rie Osaka; Chieko Shiragami; Kenji Sogawa; Akikazu Mochizuki; Rumiko Shiraga; Takeumi Kaneko; Chikatapu Chandrasekhar; Akitaka Tsujikawa; Motohiro Kamei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  [Reliability and safety of intravitreal Ozurdex injections. The ZERO study].

Authors:  K Schmitz; M Maier; C R Clemens; F Höhn; J Wachtlin; F Lehmann; T Bertelmann; K Rüdiger; M Horn; A Bezatis; G Spital; C H Meyer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Dexamethasone implant (ozurdex) in a case with unilateral simultaneous central retinal vein and branch retinal artery occlusion.

Authors:  Taylan Ozturk; Omer Takes; A Osman Saatci
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.