Literature DB >> 23637426

Infanticide and moral consistency.

Jeff McMahan1.   

Abstract

The aim of this essay is to show that there are no easy options for those who are disturbed by the suggestion that infanticide may on occasion be morally permissible. The belief that infanticide is always wrong is doubtfully compatible with a range of widely shared moral beliefs that underlie various commonly accepted practices. Any set of beliefs about the morality of abortion, infanticide and the killing of animals that is internally consistent and even minimally credible will therefore unavoidably contain some beliefs that are counterintuitive.

Keywords:  Abortion; Embryos and Fetuses; Philosophical Ethics; Quality/Value of Life/Personhood

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23637426     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

1.  Involuntary euthanasia of severely ill newborns: is the Groningen Protocol really dangerous?

Authors:  P Voultsos; F Chatzinikolaou
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  An Alternative to the Orthodoxy in Animal Ethics? Limits and Merits of the Wittgensteinian Critique of Moral Individualism.

Authors:  Susana Monsó; Herwig Grimm
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.