Literature DB >> 23636524

Reply to: doi:10.1007/s00464-013-2958-8: Re: Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250) : do we know the correct sample size?

José Noguera1.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23636524     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2963-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250).

Authors:  José F Noguera; Angel Cuadrado; Carlos Dolz; José M Olea; Juan C García
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  EAES recommendations on methodology of innovation management in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Edmund A M Neugebauer; Monika Becker; Gerhard F Buess; Alfred Cuschieri; Hans-Peter Dauben; Abe Fingerhut; Karl H Fuchs; Brigitte Habermalz; Leonid Lantsberg; Mario Morino; Stella Reiter-Theil; Gabriela Soskuty; Wolfgang Wayand; Thilo Welsch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Sample size reassessment in non-inferiority trials. Internal pilot study designs with ANCOVA.

Authors:  T Friede; M Kieser
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Comment on "prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250)" (doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2359-4).

Authors:  Mark A Carlson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.584

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.