Literature DB >> 23636458

Functional morphology underlies performance differences among invasive and non-invasive ruderal Rubus species.

Joshua S Caplan1, J Alan Yeakley.   

Abstract

The ability of some introduced plant species to outperform native species under altered resource conditions makes them highly productive in ecosystems with surplus resources. However, ruderal native species are also productive when resources are available. The differences in abundance among invasive and non-invasive ruderal plants may be related to differences in ability to maintain access to or store resources for continual use. For a group of ruderal species in the Pacific Northwest of North America (invasive Rubus armeniacus; non-invasive R. ursinus, R. parviflorus, R. spectabilis, and Rosa nutkana), we sought to determine whether differences in functional morphological traits, especially metrics of water access and storage, were consistent with differences in water conductance and growth rate. We also investigated the changes in these traits in response to abundant vs. limited water availability. Rubus armeniacus had among the largest root systems and cane cross-sectional areas, the lowest cane tissue densities, and the most plastic ratios of leaf area to plant mass and of xylem area to leaf area, often sharing its rank with R. ursinus or Rosa nutkana. These three species had the highest water conductance and relative growth rates, though Rubus armeniacus grew the most rapidly when water was not limited. Our results suggest that water access and storage abilities vary with morphology among the ruderal species investigated, and that these abilities, in combination, are greatest in the invasive. In turn, functional morphological traits allow R. armeniacus to maintain rapid gas exchange rates during the dry summers in its invaded range, conferring on it high productivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23636458     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-013-2639-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  14 in total

1.  Comparative water use of native and invasive plants at multiple scales: a global meta-analysis.

Authors:  Molly A Cavaleri; Lawren Sack
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems.

Authors:  Jennifer L Funk; Peter M Vitousek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Evergreen coniferous forests of the pacific northwest.

Authors:  R H Waring; J F Franklin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-06-29       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  A functional trait perspective on plant invasion.

Authors:  Rebecca E Drenovsky; Brenda J Grewell; Carla M D'Antonio; Jennifer L Funk; Jeremy J James; Nicole Molinari; Ingrid M Parker; Christina L Richards
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Plasticity in the Huber value contributes to homeostasis in leaf water relations of a mallee Eucalypt with variation to groundwater depth.

Authors:  Jennifer L Carter; Donald A White
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 4.196

6.  Photosynthetic characteristics of invasive and noninvasive species of Rubus (Rosaceae).

Authors:  Susan C L McDowell
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.844

Review 7.  Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation.

Authors:  Ingo Kowarik
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Evolutionarily stable strategy carbon allocation to foliage, wood, and fine roots in trees competing for light and nitrogen: an analytically tractable, individual-based model and quantitative comparisons to data.

Authors:  Ray Dybzinski; Caroline Farrior; Adam Wolf; Peter B Reich; Stephen W Pacala
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Don't judge species on their origins.

Authors:  Mark A Davis; Matthew K Chew; Richard J Hobbs; Ariel E Lugo; John J Ewel; Geerat J Vermeij; James H Brown; Michael L Rosenzweig; Mark R Gardener; Scott P Carroll; Ken Thompson; Steward T A Pickett; Juliet C Stromberg; Peter Del Tredici; Katharine N Suding; Joan G Ehrenfeld; J Philip Grime; Joseph Mascaro; John C Briggs
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Reproductive effort in invasive and non-invasive Rubus.

Authors:  Susan C McDowell; David P Turner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  6 in total

1.  Native and non-native ruderals experience similar plant-soil feedbacks and neighbor effects in a system where they coexist.

Authors:  Mariana C Chiuffo; Andrew S MacDougall; José L Hierro
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Nutrient foraging strategies are associated with productivity and population growth in forest shrubs.

Authors:  Joshua S Caplan; Bram W G Stone; Cara A Faillace; Jonathan J Lafond; Joni M Baumgarten; Thomas J Mozdzer; John Dighton; Scott J Meiners; Jason C Grabosky; Joan G Ehrenfeld
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Proteomic Analyses Provide Novel Insights into Plant Growth and Ginsenoside Biosynthesis in Forest Cultivated Panax ginseng (F. Ginseng).

Authors:  Rui Ma; Liwei Sun; Xuenan Chen; Bing Mei; Guijuan Chang; Manying Wang; Daqing Zhao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  The invasive stoloniferous clonal plant Alternanthera philoxeroides outperforms its co-occurring non-invasive functional counterparts in heterogeneous soil environments - invasion implications.

Authors:  Tong Wang; Jiangtao Hu; Linlin Miao; Dan Yu; Chunhua Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Functional traits underlying performance variations in the overwintering of the cosmopolitan invasive plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) under climate warming and water drawdown.

Authors:  Xiaolong Huang; Fan Ke; Qisheng Li; Yu Zhao; Baohua Guan; Kuanyi Li
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Phylogenetic and ecological patterns in nighttime transpiration among five members of the genus Rubus co-occurring in western Oregon.

Authors:  Brandon McNellis; Ava R Howard
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.