Literature DB >> 23636183

Risk factors associated with deep surgical site infections after primary total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 56,216 knees.

Robert S Namba1, Maria C S Inacio, Elizabeth W Paxton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deep surgical site infection following total knee arthroplasty is a devastating complication. Patient and surgical risk factors for this complication have not been thoroughly examined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors associated with deep surgical site infection following total knee arthroplasty in a large U.S. integrated health-care system.
METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively followed cohort of primary total knee arthroplasties recorded in a total joint replacement registry from 2001 to 2009 was conducted. Records were screened for deep surgical site infection with use of a validated algorithm, and the results were adjudicated by chart review. Patient factors, surgical factors, and surgeon and hospital characteristics were identified with use of the total joint replacement registry. Cox regression models were used to assess risk factors associated with deep surgical site infection.
RESULTS: A total of 56,216 total knee arthroplasties were identified; 63.0% were done in women, the average age of the patients was 67.4 years (standard deviation [SD] = 9.6), and the average body mass index (BMI) was 32 kg/m2 (SD = 6). The incidence of deep surgical site infection was 0.72% (404/56,216). In a fully adjusted model, patient factors associated with deep surgical site infection included a BMI of ≥35 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.47), diabetes mellitus (HR = 1.28), male sex (HR = 1.89), an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of ≥3 (HR = 1.65), a diagnosis of osteonecrosis (HR = 3.65), and a diagnosis of posttraumatic arthritis (HR = 3.23). Hispanic race was protective (HR = 0.69). Protective surgical factors included use of antibiotic irrigation (HR = 0.67), a bilateral procedure (HR = 0.51), and a lower annual hospital volume (HR = 0.33). Surgical risk factors included quadriceps-release exposure (HR = 4.76) and the use of antibiotic-laden cement (HR = 1.53). In a subanalysis, operative time was a risk factor, with a 9% increased risk per fifteen-minute increment.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of a comprehensive infection surveillance system, combined with a total joint replacement registry, identified patient and surgical factors associated with infection following total knee arthroplasty in a large sample. High-risk patients should be counseled, and modifiable clinical conditions should be optimized. Use of antibiotic irrigation should be encouraged, but antibiotic-laden cement may not be useful. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23636183     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  129 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection following primary total hip or knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingde Kong; Junming Cao; Yingze Zhang; Wenyuan Ding; Yong Shen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-07-10       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Contamination Relative to the Activation Timing of Filtered-Exhaust Helmets.

Authors:  Andrew E Hanselman; Michael D Montague; Timothy R Murphy; Matthew J Dietz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  The adverse effects of diabetes on osteoarthritis: update on clinical evidence and molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  K B King; A K Rosenthal
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  The Gown-glove Interface Is a Source of Contamination: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  James F Fraser; Simon W Young; Kimberly A Valentine; Nicholas E Probst; Mark J Spangehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  What are the important manoeuvres for beginners to minimize surgical time in primary total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Kengo Harato; Shinichi Maeno; Hidenori Tanikawa; Kazuya Kaneda; Yutaro Morishige; So Nomoto; Yasuo Niki
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Antibacterial Prophylaxis for Surgical Site Infection in the Elderly: Practical Application.

Authors:  Maria Adriana Cataldo; Guido Granata; Nicola Petrosillo
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Does modern space suit reduce intraoperative contamination in total joint replacement? An experimental study.

Authors:  Daisuke Nakajima; Toshiyuki Tateiwa; Toshinori Masaoka; Yasuhito Takahashi; Takaaki Shishido; Kengo Yamamoto
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-10-31

Review 8.  Prosthetic Joint Infections: an Update.

Authors:  C L Abad; A Haleem
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.725

9.  Statistical Methods Dictate the Estimated Impact of Body Mass Index on Major and Minor Complications After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mary J Kwasny; Adam I Edelstein; David W Manning
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Moderating effects of immunosuppressive medications and risk factors for post-operative joint infection following total joint arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Salt; Amanda T Wiggins; Mary Kay Rayens; Brent J Morris; David Mannino; Andrew Hoellein; Ryan P Donegan; Leslie J Crofford
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 5.532

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.