Literature DB >> 23636129

Topographically-patterned porous membranes in a microfluidic device as an in vitro model of renal reabsorptive barriers.

Else M Frohlich1, José Luis Alonso, Jeffrey T Borenstein, Xin Zhang, M Amin Arnaout, Joseph L Charest.   

Abstract

Models of reabsorptive barriers require both a means to provide realistic physiologic cues to and quantify transport across a layer of cells forming the barrier. Here we have topographically-patterned porous membranes with several user-defined pattern types. To demonstrate the utility of the patterned membranes, we selected one type of pattern and applied it to a membrane to serve as a cell culture support in a microfluidic model of a renal reabsorptive barrier. The topographic cues in the model resemble physiological cues found in vivo while the porous structure allows quantification of transport across the cell layer. Sub-micron surface topography generated via hot-embossing onto a track-etched polycarbonate membrane, fully replicated topographical features and preserved porous architecture. Pore size and shape were analyzed with SEM and image analysis to determine the effect of hot embossing on pore morphology. The membrane was assembled into a bilayer microfluidic device and a human kidney proximal tubule epithelial cell line (HK-2) and primary renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (RPTEC) were cultured to confluency on the membrane. Immunofluorescent staining of both cell types revealed protein expression indicative of the formation of a reabsorptive barrier responsive to mechanical stimulation: ZO-1 (tight junction), paxillin (focal adhesions) and acetylated α-tubulin (primary cilia). HK-2 and RPTEC aligned in the direction of ridge/groove topography of the membrane in the device, evidence that the device has mechanical control over cell response. This topographically-patterned porous membrane provides an in vitro platform on which to model reabsorptive barriers with meaningful applications for understanding biological transport phenomenon, underlying disease mechanisms, and drug toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23636129      PMCID: PMC4578304          DOI: 10.1039/c3lc50199j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  45 in total

1.  Hot embossing for micropatterned cell substrates.

Authors:  Joseph L Charest; Lindsay E Bryant; Andres J Garcia; William P King
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Novel approach to fabricate keratin sponge scaffolds with controlled pore size and porosity.

Authors:  Kazunori Katoh; Toshizumi Tanabe; Kiyoshi Yamauchi
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Combined microscale mechanical topography and chemical patterns on polymer cell culture substrates.

Authors:  Joseph L Charest; Marcus T Eliason; Andrés J García; William P King
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Myoblast alignment and differentiation on cell culture substrates with microscale topography and model chemistries.

Authors:  Joseph L Charest; Andrés J García; William P King
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder.

Authors:  Matthew J Dalby; Nikolaj Gadegaard; Rahul Tare; Abhay Andar; Mathis O Riehle; Pawel Herzyk; Chris D W Wilkinson; Richard O C Oreffo
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2007-09-23       Impact factor: 43.841

6.  Enhancement of In Vitro Capillary Tube Formation by Substrate Nanotopography.

Authors:  Christopher J Bettinger; Zhitong Zhang; Sharon Gerecht; Jeffrey T Borenstein; Robert Langer
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 30.849

7.  The formation of pores in the basal lamina of regenerated renal tubules.

Authors:  Annette Blattmann; Lucia Denk; Raimund Strehl; Hayo Castrop; Will W Minuth
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Renal basement membranes by ultrahigh resolution scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  K Hironaka; H Makino; Y Yamasaki; Z Ota
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 9.  Review of the gastrointestinal tract: from macro to micro.

Authors:  Kathleen K Reed; Rita Wickham
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.315

Review 10.  Nephrotoxicity testing in vitro--what we know and what we need to know.

Authors:  W Pfaller; G Gstraunthaler
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  12 in total

1.  Synergistic effects of matrix nanotopography and stiffness on vascular smooth muscle cell function.

Authors:  Somali Chaterji; Peter Kim; Seung H Choe; Jonathan H Tsui; Christoffer H Lam; Derek S Ho; Aaron B Baker; Deok-Ho Kim
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  A Role for 3D Printing in Kidney-on-a-Chip Platforms.

Authors:  Ryan D Sochol; Navin R Gupta; Joseph V Bonventre
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2016-01-20

Review 3.  Approaches to in vitro tissue regeneration with application for human disease modeling and drug development.

Authors:  Mohammad R Ebrahimkhani; Carissa L Young; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Linda G Griffith; Jeffrey T Borenstein
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 7.851

4.  Screening of Drug-Transporter Interactions in a 3D Microfluidic Renal Proximal Tubule on a Chip.

Authors:  Jelle Vriend; Tom T G Nieskens; Marianne K Vormann; Bartholomeus T van den Berge; Angelique van den Heuvel; Frans G M Russel; Laura Suter-Dick; Henriëtte L Lanz; Paul Vulto; Rosalinde Masereeuw; Martijn J Wilmer
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Drug absorption related nephrotoxicity assessment on an intestine-kidney chip.

Authors:  Zhongyu Li; Wentao Su; Yujuan Zhu; Tingting Tao; Dong Li; Xiaojun Peng; Jianhua Qin
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 6.  Tissue-engineered kidney disease models.

Authors:  Teresa M Desrochers; Erica Palma; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 7.  Microfluidic approaches for epithelial cell layer culture and characterisation.

Authors:  Roland Thuenauer; Enrique Rodriguez-Boulan; Winfried Römer
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 4.616

8.  A Reversibly Sealed, Easy Access, Modular (SEAM) Microfluidic Architecture to Establish In Vitro Tissue Interfaces.

Authors:  Vinay V Abhyankar; Meiye Wu; Chung-Yan Koh; Anson V Hatch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A microfluidic renal proximal tubule with active reabsorptive function.

Authors:  Else M Vedula; José Luis Alonso; M Amin Arnaout; Joseph L Charest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effect of flow on targeting and penetration of angiopep-decorated nanoparticles in a microfluidic model blood-brain barrier.

Authors:  Iason Papademetriou; Else Vedula; Joseph Charest; Tyrone Porter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.