Literature DB >> 2363602

Breast-conserving therapy for macroscopically multiple cancers.

J M Kurtz1, J Jacquemier, R Amalric, H Brandone, Y Ayme, D Hans, C Bressac, J M Spitalier.   

Abstract

Of 586 unilateral stage I-II breast cancers treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy, 61 patients were found to have two or more macroscopic tumor nodules, diagnosed either clinically (n = 20), mammographically (n = 2), or on gross pathologic examination (n = 39). After a median follow-up of 71 months, 15 of 61 (25%) of the patients with multiple tumors developed recurrence in the treated breast, compared to 56 of 525 (11%) of patients with single cancers (p less than 0.005). Local failure occurred in 6 of 37 (16%) of bifocal tumors and in 9 of 24 (35%) of patients with 3 or more tumor foci. Recurrence was more frequent for multiplicity diagnosed clinically or mammographically (8 of 22 patients, 36%) than when it was apparent only to the pathologist (7 of 39 patients, 18%). Only 1 of 21 bifocal tumors diagnosed on gross examination recurred. Local failure occurred in only 1 of 22 cases with clearly negative resection margins; the remaining recurrences were associated with positive (n = 3) or indeterminate margins (n = 11). In contrast with recurrences of unifocal breast cancers, local failures in these patients tended to be located at a distance from the original foci, to be multifocal, or to be diffuse, including skin involvement. Only four recurrences presented as a single focus in the vicinity of the original primary tumors. This study indicates that macroscopically multiple breast cancers are at higher local failure risk, especially if multiplicity is clinically apparent, or if three or more gross nodules are seen on pathologic examination. Negative resection margins appear to be essential for satisfactory results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2363602      PMCID: PMC1358072          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199007000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  22 in total

1.  The case against tylectomy for carcinoma of the breast. The factor of multicentricity.

Authors:  L Morgenstern; P A Kaufman; N B Friedman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Pitfalls of local excision in the treatment of carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  J P Shah; P P Rosen; G F Robbins
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1973-05

3.  The study of mammary carcinoma by mammography and whole organ sectioning. Early observations.

Authors:  H S Gallager; J E Martin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Conservative surgery and irradiation in the treatment of early breast cancer.

Authors:  B F Danoff; D G Haller; J H Glick; R L Goodman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  The concept and implications of multicentricity in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  M D Lagios; P R Westdahl; M R Rose
Journal:  Pathol Annu       Date:  1981

6.  Conservation therapy for breast cancers other than infiltrating ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  J M Kurtz; J Jacquemier; J Torhorst; J M Spitalier; R Amalric; R Hünig; E Walther; F Harder; A Almendral; H Brandone
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Radiation therapy with or without primary limited surgery for operable breast cancer: a 20-year experience at the Marseilles Cancer Institute.

Authors:  R Amalric; F Santamaria; F Robert; J Seigle; C Altschuler; J M Kurtz; J M Spitalier; H Brandone; Y Ayme; J F Pollet; R Burmeister; R Abed
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Multicentricity and bilaterality in invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  M L Lesser; P P Rosen; D W Kinne
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Pathologic predictors of early local recurrence in Stage I and II breast cancer treated by primary radiation therapy.

Authors:  S J Schnitt; J L Connolly; J R Harris; S Hellman; R B Cohen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  28 in total

1.  Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: results of a survey.

Authors:  Alphonse Taghian; Majid Mohiuddin; Reshma Jagsi; Saveli Goldberg; Elizabeth Ceilley; Simon Powell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Risk factors and management of local recurrence following breast conservation surgery.

Authors:  R T Osteen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Is breast conservative surgery a reasonable option in multifocal or multicentric tumors?

Authors:  Gilles Houvenaeghel; Agnès Tallet; Aurélie Jalaguier-Coudray; Monique Cohen; Marie Bannier; Camille Jauffret-Fara; Eric Lambaudie
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-10

4.  The Feasibility of Breast-Conserving Surgery for Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: An Initial Report from ACOSOG Z11102 (Alliance) Trial.

Authors:  Kari M Rosenkranz; Karla Ballman; Linda McCall; Charlotte Kubicky; Laurie Cuttino; Huong Le-Petross; Kelly K Hunt; Armando Giuliano; Kimberly J Van Zee; Bruce Haffty; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Patient selection criteria for conservation surgery versus mastectomy: Memorial Hospital breast service experience.

Authors:  M P Moore; D W Kinne
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Prognostic factors for local recurrence in breast conservation therapy: residual cancers after lumpectomy.

Authors:  T Fukutomi; H Yamamoto; T Nanasawa; M Itabashi; T Hirota
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 7.  The curability of breast cancer and the treatment of advanced disease.

Authors:  Valentina Guarneri; Pier Franco Conte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-24       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Multiple margin positivity of frozen section is an independent risk factor for local recurrence in breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Jeeyeon Lee; Seokwon Lee; Youngtae Bae
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.588

9.  Cosmetic Outcomes Following Breast-Conservation Surgery and Radiation for Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: Data from the Alliance Z11102 Study.

Authors:  Kari M Rosenkranz; Karla Ballman; Linda McCall; Colleen McCarthy; Charlotte D Kubicky; Laurie Cuttino; Kelly K Hunt; Armando Giuliano; Kimberly J Van Zee; Bruce Haffty; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Optimising Breast Conservation Treatment for Multifocal and Multicentric Breast Cancer: A Worthwhile Endeavour?

Authors:  Mona P Tan; Nadya Y Sitoh; Yih Yiow Sitoh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.