PURPOSE: This study's purpose was to determine the efficacy of indirect pulp treatment (IPT) in primary molars when using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate disinfecting solution and resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) liner after 12 months. METHODS: Three- to 10-year-old subjects with deep carious lesions who met selection criteria participated. Infected dentin was removed using a caries detector, and residual affected dentin was left on the pulpal floor to prevent pulp exposure. A 2% chlorhexidine gluconate solution and a RMGI liner were placed. Teeth were restored with composite or full-coverage (stainless steel crown [SSC]) restorations. Follow-up evaluations at 3, 6, and 12 months included clinical, radiographic, and photographic assessments. RESULTS: A total of 60 teeth were treated. Treatment was successful in 50/50 (100%), 41/42 (∼98%), and 31/32 (∼97%) teeth at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits, respectively. Failures included one at 6 months in a primary second molar with a composite restoration and another at 12 months in a primary first molar with a SSC. CONCLUSIONS: Indirect pulp treatment is effective in primary teeth, although appropriate case selection and an adequate marginal seal are essential for a successful outcome. Further prospective studies are needed to expand the body of evidence that clinicians use to justify decisions on clinical care.
PURPOSE: This study's purpose was to determine the efficacy of indirect pulp treatment (IPT) in primary molars when using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate disinfecting solution and resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) liner after 12 months. METHODS: Three- to 10-year-old subjects with deep carious lesions who met selection criteria participated. Infected dentin was removed using a caries detector, and residual affected dentin was left on the pulpal floor to prevent pulp exposure. A 2% chlorhexidine gluconate solution and a RMGI liner were placed. Teeth were restored with composite or full-coverage (stainless steel crown [SSC]) restorations. Follow-up evaluations at 3, 6, and 12 months included clinical, radiographic, and photographic assessments. RESULTS: A total of 60 teeth were treated. Treatment was successful in 50/50 (100%), 41/42 (∼98%), and 31/32 (∼97%) teeth at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits, respectively. Failures included one at 6 months in a primary second molar with a composite restoration and another at 12 months in a primary first molar with a SSC. CONCLUSIONS: Indirect pulp treatment is effective in primary teeth, although appropriate case selection and an adequate marginal seal are essential for a successful outcome. Further prospective studies are needed to expand the body of evidence that clinicians use to justify decisions on clinical care.
Authors: Matilde Ruiz-Linares; Carmen Maria Ferrer-Luque; Teresa Arias-Moliz; Paula de Castro; Beatriz Aguado; Pilar Baca Journal: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: Mohammed S Bin-Shuwaish; Alhanouf A AlHussaini; Lina H AlHudaithy; Shamma A AlDukhiel; Abdullah S Al-Jamhan Journal: Saudi Dent J Date: 2020-10-01