Literature DB >> 23635710

ACOG committee opinion no. 561: Nonmedically indicated early-term deliveries.

.   

Abstract

For certain medical conditions, available data and expert opinion support optimal timing of delivery in the late-preterm or early-term period for improved neonatal and infant outcomes. However, for nonmedically indicated early-term deliveries such an improvement has not been demonstrated. Morbidity and mortality rates are greater among neonates and infants delivered during the early-term period compared with those delivered between 39 weeks and 40 weeks of gestation. Nevertheless, the rate of nonmedically indicated early-term deliveries continues to increase in the United States. Implementation of a policy to decrease the rate of nonmedically indicated deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation has been found to both decrease the number of these deliveries and improve neonatal outcomes; however, more research is necessary to further characterize pregnancies at risk for in utero morbidity or mortality. Also of concern is that at least one state Medicaid agency has stopped reimbursement for nonindicated deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation. Avoidance of nonindicated delivery before 39 weeks of gestation should not be accompanied by an increase in expectant management of patients with indications for delivery before 39 weeks of gestation. Management decisions, therefore, should balance the risks of pregnancy prolongation with the neonatal and infant risks associated with early-term delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23635710     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000428649.57622.a7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  48 in total

1.  Prevention of early-term deliveries: much ado about nothing?

Authors:  Errol R Norwitz; James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013

2.  Insights in public health: saving babies: reducing infant mortality in Hawai'i.

Authors:  Donald K Hayes; Candice R Calhoun; Terri J Byers; Linda R Chock; Patricia L Heu; Danette Wong Tomiyasu; David T Sakamoto; Loretta J Fuddy
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2013-07

3.  Association of Temporal Changes in Gestational Age With Perinatal Mortality in the United States, 2007-2015.

Authors:  Cande V Ananth; Robert L Goldenberg; Alexander M Friedman; Anthony M Vintzileos
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 16.193

4.  Healthy birth practice #1: let labor begin on its own.

Authors:  Debby Amis
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2014

5.  Grand Multiparous Mothers' Embodied Experiences of Natural and Technological Altered Births.

Authors:  Susan E Fleming; Roxanne Vandermause; Michele Shaw; Billie Severtsen
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2017

6.  Healthy Birth Practice #1: Let Labor Begin on Its Own.

Authors:  Debby Amis
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2019-04-01

7.  A Statewide Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Non-Medically Indicated Scheduled Deliveries.

Authors:  Marilyn A Kacica; J Christopher Glantz; Kuangnan Xiong; Eileen P Shields; Peter H Cherouny
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-04

8.  Association Between Temporal Changes in Neonatal Mortality and Spontaneous and Clinician-Initiated Deliveries in the United States, 2006-2013.

Authors:  Cande V Ananth; Alexander M Friedman; Robert L Goldenberg; Jason D Wright; Anthony M Vintzileos
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 16.193

9.  Neonatal outcomes in early term birth.

Authors:  Laura I Parikh; Uma M Reddy; Tuija Männistö; Pauline Mendola; Lindsey Sjaarda; Stefanie Hinkle; Zhen Chen; Zhaohui Lu; S Katherine Laughon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Public Health Implications of Very Preterm Birth.

Authors:  Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.