Literature DB >> 23635618

Vaginal prolapse recurrence after uterosacral ligament suspension in normal-weight compared with overweight and obese women.

Autumn L Edenfield1, Cindy L Amundsen, Alison C Weidner, Jennifer M Wu, Amy George, Nazema Y Siddiqui.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare recurrent prolapse after vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension in normal-weight compared with overweight or obese women.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of the risk of recurrent prolapse after uterosacral ligament suspension in normal-weight compared with overweight or obese women at our institution from December 1, 1996, through June 30, 2011. Women with fewer than 6 months of follow-up and those with a prior vault suspension were excluded. Our primary outcome was a composite measure defined as anterior, posterior, or apical prolapse recurrence extending beyond the hymen or repeat treatment for prolapse with surgery or a pessary in women undergoing uterosacral ligament suspension and other vaginal repairs.
RESULTS: We included 219 participants (81 [37%] normal-weight and 138 [63%] overweight or obese women). There was no difference in median follow-up (14 months; interquartile range 8.5-26.5 months] in the normal-weight compared with 13 months [interquartile range 9.0-29.0 months] in the overweight or obese women, P=.98). Prolapse recurred in 22.2% (n=18) of the normal-weight group and 26.1% (n=36) of the overweight or obese group (P=.52). Surgery for recurrent prolapse was performed in 16.0% (n=13) of the normal-weight women and in 14.5% (n=20) of the overweight or obese women (P=.76). The most common site of recurrence was the anterior compartment (17.4% [n=38]) compared with the apical compartment (8.7% [n=19]) or posterior compartment (6.8% [n=15]) with no significant difference between cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: After uterosacral ligament suspension, overweight or obese women have similar prolapse recurrence compared with normal-weight women. Anterior prolapse is the most common site of recurrence after uterosacral ligament suspension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23635618     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182839eeb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  8 in total

Review 1.  Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: International Urogynecological Association Research and Development Committee opinion.

Authors:  Sharif Ismail; Jonathan Duckett; Diaa Rizk; Olanrewaju Sorinola; Dorothy Kammerer-Doak; Oscar Contreras-Ortiz; Hazem Al-Mandeel; Kamil Svabik; Mitesh Parekh; Christian Phillips
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Risk factors for prolapse recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Talia Friedman; Guy D Eslick; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Retrospective Cohort of Absorbable and Permanent Suture Groups.

Authors:  Megan S Bradley; Jennifer A Bickhaus; Cindy L Amundsen; Laura K Newcomb; Tracy Truong; Alison C Weidner; Nazema Y Siddiqui
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.091

Review 4.  Native tissue repair for central compartment prolapse: a narrative review.

Authors:  Dorit Paz-Levy; David Yohay; Joerg Neymeyer; Ranit Hizkiyahu; Adi Y Weintraub
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after apical prolapse repair: does obesity matter?

Authors:  Nina Durchfort Metcalfe; Lisa M Shandley; Marisa Rogers Young; Michelle Higgins; Chidimma Abanulo; Gina M Northington
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Recurrent apical prolapse after high uterosacral ligament suspension - in a heterogenous cohort characterised by a high prevalence of previous pelvic operations.

Authors:  Katrine Dahl Pedersen; Marie Højriis Storkholm; Karl Møller Bek; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen; Susanne Greisen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 7.  Clinical challenges in the management of vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Nazema Y Siddiqui; Autumn L Edenfield
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-01-16

Review 8.  Obesity and Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Andrzej Pomian; Wojciech Lisik; Maciej Kosieradzki; Ewa Barcz
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-06-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.